> That's odd, and non-standard, and the reason I need (to write apparently) a
> patch. We have security auditors who don't like applications writing to
> directories outside of their scope.
The underlay directory has to be considered as part of the wiki
instance, so that is definitely NOT outside
> I'm wondering if it is possible to have a slightly different style when
> editing content. I would like to have a general style that is narrow,
> so it doesn't take all the screen width. Long p aragraphs don't look
> well in
> wide layout (especially on wide display) and are difficult t
> Thanks for the responses, Marcel and Thomas. Thomas, I did do the
> cache flush procedure as part of the upgrade, plus i did the manual
> cache deletion you suggested. what was interesting is that the only
> file in there was "en" which appears to be an '8086 relocatable
> (Microsoft)'
LOL.
Thomas Waldmann wrote:
>> None of the wiki instances I maintain need to have a writable underlay
>> directory, yet the system data_underlay_dir complains if it is not
>> writable
>
> But they need to be writable for moin as it will store some caches into
> the pagedirs.
That's odd, and non-standar
Hi.
I'm wondering if it is possible to have a slightly different style when
editing content. I would like to have a general style that is narrow,
so it doesn't take all the screen width. Long paragraphs don't look well in
wide layout (especially on wide display) and are difficult to read.
Howeve
>> page I see:
>>
>> KeyError
>> 'en'
>> If you want to report a bug, please save this page and attach it to
>> your bug report.
>> [etc]
>>
>
> below "report a bug" there is normally a traceback, this would be very
> usefull if you can submit this also. because this shows where the error
> occur
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 16:16 -0800, Roger Marquis wrote:
> None of the wiki instances I maintain need to have a writable underlay
> directory, yet the system data_underlay_dir complains if it is not
> writable
They are not writable for the wiki user (due to ACLs).
But they need to be writable for
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:29:39PM -0500, Jakub Schmidtke wrote:
> Hm, I have the similar problem. Should I contact you on priv as well? ;)
>
You're welcome.
> Maybe it would be better to explain it here, or even better - to put
> somewhere in the documentation? Possibly put a link on tha
