On 10/15/15 11:20 AM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> The moin command usually works best (or at all) with some extra options. Try
> this:
>
> moin --config-dir=WIKIDIR maint cleancache
>
> Here, WIKIDIR is the directory containing wikiconfig.py.
IT WORKS! I did try adding the path to the wiki instance ori
On Thursday 15. October 2015 15.43.19 Chris Freemesser wrote:
> On 10/15/15 8:49 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > You'll just need to clean the cache, most likely:
> >
> > moint maint cleancache
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but running the command results in a bunch of
> log lines that concludes w
On Thursday 15. October 2015 14.42.39 Chris Freemesser wrote:
> (My apologies if this gets posted twice...had a change of e-mail addresses)
Only one copy received here so far! :-)
> Hi all.
>
> A (hopefully) quick question:
>
> If you have wikis created on a server running 1.9.3 and you set up
On 10/15/15 8:49 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> You'll just need to clean the cache, most likely:
>
> moint maint cleancache
Thanks for the suggestion, but running the command results in a bunch of log
lines that concludes with:
"MoinMoin.error.ConfigurationError: ImportError: No module named wiki
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:42:39AM -0400, Chris Freemesser wrote:
>(My apologies if this gets posted twice...had a change of e-mail addresses)
>
>Hi all.
>
>A (hopefully) quick question:
>
>If you have wikis created on a server running 1.9.3 and you set up a new
>server
>running 1.9.8 with the fi
Am 09.01.2013 21:34, schrieb Thomas Scofield:
>
> I had a standalone MoinMoin wiki (v. 1.9.3) going some time ago on my Mac,
> before I was upgraded to Lion. (I presume another upgrade to Mountain Lion
> at least is coming this summer.) Afterwards, my wiki failed to work as
> before, though I
McLaughlin, Daniel D wrote:
> Sorry. I wasn't clear.
>
> I have no prior wiki experience to base any comparisons with MoinMoin.
>
> I was asked to download MoinMoin and set up a standalone wiki for a team I
> support. Now the requirements for authentication, security, backups, and
> support h
2009 1:17 PM
To: McLaughlin, Daniel D
Cc: moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Moin-user] Migrating to MediaWiki
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:37 PM, McLaughlin, Daniel D
wrote:
> Although seeking support from the target wiki is the more logical approach,
> Corp IT didn't even offer
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:37 PM, McLaughlin, Daniel D
wrote:
> Although seeking support from the target wiki is the more logical approach,
> Corp IT didn't even offer that as a method toward a solution. Hello??
>
> I'll have to get pushy.
> Thanks
What is your point ?
Why do you actually not li
9 10:25 AM
To: McLaughlin, Daniel D
Cc: moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Moin-user] Migrating to MediaWiki
Hi Daniel,
> I have a MoinMoin 1.8 standalone wiki that I would like to migrate to
> our IT MediaWiki (PHP) system.
Better do it the other way. :D
> Is this possible, an
Hi Daniel,
> I have a MoinMoin 1.8 standalone wiki that I would like to migrate to
> our IT MediaWiki (PHP) system.
Better do it the other way. :D
> Is this possible, and if so, is there a procedure documented?
Usually people having that problem hack some stuff to do 90% of the
conversion effor
> Or Moin had an option to use reStructuredText syntax as the wiki
> format. That would be really cool.
#format rst
:)
BTW, the parser code doing rst within moin searches a maintainer using
it and caring for it.
--
S
2008/12/11 cpghost :
> Hi,
>
> before I start writing a complex migration script to port 1300+ pages
> worth of MoinMoin data to reStructuredText or Sphinx syntax, I'm
> wondering if such a beast already exists. It would be even better if
> the resulting pages were still "MoinMoin-able", i.e. edita
replicate the wiki? I have a test VM up and
> running at the moment
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Vanderveer
> Sent: 15 August 2008 16:34
> To: moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Moin-user
What do I need to copy over to replicate the wiki? I have a test VM up and
running at the moment
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Vanderveer
Sent: 15 August 2008 16:34
To: moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Moin-user
Just to second what Thomas already said; upgrading to the later
versions of Moin is worth it. Each new release get successively more
features that are not only nicer and more powerful for your users, but
also nicer and more powerful for you as the admin.
Rather than mucking with a "live" wiki ser
> Problem is, I wont be able to upgrade to 1.5.9 - it’s a live environment,
> with other things running on the server.
Hmm, I don't see the problem.
If you have to be extremely careful due to "mission critical or 24/7"
requirements, you can setup a test wiki in parallel and first try the
stuff t
have to install .11 on the new server and
just run with that.
:(
Thanks for the info
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Waldmann
Sent: 15 August 2008 12:53
To: moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Moin-user] Migrating
> The wiki version is 0.11.
Ugh, stuff from stone-age. :)
> On another server, I have wiki version 1.51 running. I want to migrate
> the data from the old version to the new version.
I suggest you first migrate the 1.5.1 one to 1.5.9 - that should be
rather easy (and that is the latest and last
Hey Sabastian,
Firstly, I do have in my instructions that you should test on a test
platform before upgrading your actual moin wiki (mentioned in the intro,
before the instructions). :-) So, in other words, I couldn't agree with
you more-- you need to TEST with you own installation first! :-)
20 matches
Mail list logo
