Peter Wirdemo wrote:
It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at
nagios ;-)
not a chance.
just that something that is simple and works doesn't really need much
attention.
* Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Peter Wirdemo wrote:
It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at
nagios ;-)
not a chance.
just that something that is simple and works doesn't really need much
attention.
On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
* Peter Wirdemo wrote:
It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at
nagios ;-)
/Peter
They do have prettier lights and a better band. However setting up
that
kind of party is a bit more complicated than a mon party.
* Alex Dean wrote:
Heh. I agree that mon's simplicity is a huge advantage. I'm using mon
to stop certain services if a network connection fails. I do this by
running a separate mon daemon on each machine.
I've though of doing something like that to restart services when they fail.
I
They'll regret it. Maybe not today. Maybe not tomorrow. But soon, and
for the rest of their life.
On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Peter Wirdemo wrote:
It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at
nagios ;-)
/Peter
Nathan Gibbs wrote:
I just posted a new revision.
I
