--On Monday, June 07, 2004 1:32 PM -0700 Jim Trocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, David Nolan wrote:
(In fact, I may have posted it to the list, but I can't recall
right now. Time for some > email archeology.)
ahh, i apologize for my confusion. clearly my recollection was faul
www.servicom2000.com
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nombre de Jim Trocki
> Enviado el: lunes, 07 de junio de 2004 22:33
> Para: David Nolan
> CC: mon mailing list
> Asunto: Re: david nolan's patches
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, David Nolan wrote:
> (In fact, I may have posted it to the list, but I can't recall
> right now. Time for some > email archeology.)
ahh, i apologize for my confusion. clearly my recollection was faulty,
and you now corrected it. thanks.
as far as maintaining the code in cvs
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:25 PM -0400 Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
gander at and d
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
> this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
> than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
> gander at and do something with if they chose, he sent them only to me
Sounds like he want
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:52 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is a matter of historical record which should be public. rather
than post his patched version to the mailing list for everyone to have a
gander at and do something with if they chose, he sent them only to me
(
attached is the "diff -u" between mon 0.99.2-6 and the version which
david nolan sent to me. if someone would like to merge them into the
most recent -devel version, test it all to be sure it works, and then
post their results, then i'm sure it would be appreciated.
this is a matter of historical