On 8/25/07, Jim Trocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Augie Schwer wrote:
As you can see there is a lot of development in CVS, but there hasn't
been an official release for a while;
Except for the one at the end of June which had a significant number of
improvements, some of
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Augie Schwer wrote:
Ooops. Duh. I wasn't on the mon@ list until recently; it doesn't show
up on the SF.net page:
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=170
shoot. i used to have a script which would push out any releases or web page
changes to the various places
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2007-08-25T06:15:31-0700, Augie Schwer wrote:
I thought the same way you did a few months ago, that the Mon project
was dead, but it's not, it's just not very visibly alive. ;)
This is bad when someone evaluate this project
On 2007-08-26T22:18:04-0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
I believe the mon-devel list receives copies of all patches.
I totally missed the two other mailing lists, so took the liberty to
update the wiki page to make it a little more obvious.
/Allan
___
mon
been an official release for a while; I'm sure when Jim wants to make
an official release, then you'll see a lot more discussion about Mon,
and maybe even some more developers. :)
I thought the same way you did a few months ago, that the Mon project
was dead, but it's not, it's just not very visibly
On 2007-08-25T06:15:31-0700, Augie Schwer wrote:
I thought the same way you did a few months ago, that the Mon project
was dead, but it's not, it's just not very visibly alive. ;)
This is bad when someone evaluate this project. Can we setup a cvs
mailing list that gets the patches, or some
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Augie Schwer wrote:
As you can see there is a lot of development in CVS, but there hasn't
been an official release for a while;
Except for the one at the end of June which had a significant number of
improvements, some of which you contributed yourself :)
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2007-08-25T06:15:31-0700, Augie Schwer wrote:
I thought the same way you did a few months ago, that the Mon project
was dead, but it's not, it's just not very visibly alive. ;)
This is bad when someone evaluate this project. Can we setup a cvs
ok, I like mon. no bloat. no crud. just does the job. so, in a sense,
there's no real need for ongoing activity or development -- except that
the user documentation is sparse or non-existent. Oh, and the name. It
took me forever to stumble on mon. I'd been looking at hobbit, nagios,
etc. Searched
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I was looking through the wiki, wishing for more detail,
recommendations, how-to, etc. On a lark, I clicked on edit. It allowed
I agree it lacks some.
I don't want to step on any toes, but I was wondering . . . if I were to
add a user
10 matches
Mail list logo
