On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:07:43AM -0400, David Nolan wrote:
Plus the complete lack of any non-development releases on Mon for almost 3
years makes me a bit wary of spending large amounts of effort on rewriting
the internals on Mon. Especially since all of the patches I've previously
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Ed Ravin wrote:
to other developers. I know I've submitted several improvements
to the monitor scripts in recent months and haven't gotten any feedback.
netapfree.monitor?
(0) uplift /home/trockij/mon/patches $ perl -c netappfree.monitor
Format not terminated at
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:30:06AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Ed Ravin wrote:
to other developers. I know I've submitted several improvements
to the monitor scripts in recent months and haven't gotten any feedback.
netapfree.monitor?
(0) uplift
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:30 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-rw-r--r--1 536536 179923 Apr 23 13:37 mon-0.99.3-41.tar.gz
It might help if you made announcements about new dev versions being
available.
Have you started integrating any of the patches I've sent you
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jim Trocki wrote:
yeah, something's funny there. i saved the message by using the pipe
raw text command in pine then ran uudeview on it, and that's what i
got. in the raw message it has no --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q to terminate the
mime attachment.
i'll have a look at this one
--On Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:02 AM -0700 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jim Trocki wrote:
yeah, something's funny there. i saved the message by using the pipe
raw text command in pine then ran uudeview on it, and that's what i
got. in the raw message it has no
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:02:22AM -0700, Jim Trocki wrote:
wtf, the one you just sent has the same problem. maybe it's an mua
problem on your end?
Curiouser and curiouser. I don't have any problems with the message
from the mailing list that I received in my mailbox, so I don't think
my MUA
