Re: mon.cgi developement
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Nathan Gibbs wrote: I have a revised version of mon.cgi at http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/ this system is inaccessible from some networks. the first syn leaves but is unanswered. ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Nathan Gibbs wrote: http://blogs.umass.edu/choogend/2007/09/12/mon-%E2%80%94-the-ultimate-minimalist-monitoring-tool/ Nice write up. Someone should put that on the mon wiki. added to the references page on the wiki. thanks, everyone. ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
Peter Wirdemo wrote: It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at nagios ;-) not a chance. just that something that is simple and works doesn't really need much attention. http://blogs.umass.edu/choogend/2007/09/12/mon-%E2%80%94-the-ultimate-minimalist-monitoring-tool/ -- --- Chris Hoogendyk - O__ Systems Administrator c/ /'_ --- Biology Geology Departments (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center ~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst hoogen...@bio.umass.edu --- Erdös 4 ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
* Chris Hoogendyk wrote: Peter Wirdemo wrote: It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at nagios ;-) not a chance. just that something that is simple and works doesn't really need much attention. http://blogs.umass.edu/choogend/2007/09/12/mon-%E2%80%94-the-ultimate-minimalist-monitoring-tool/ Nice write up. Someone should put that on the mon wiki. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Nathan Gibbs wrote: * Peter Wirdemo wrote: It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at nagios ;-) /Peter They do have prettier lights and a better band. However setting up that kind of party is a bit more complicated than a mon party. Thats what got me started with this project. When I setup mon, it took me a couple of hours. I wasted a whole day trying to get nagios to do the same thing. mon is just simpler. One config file to name them all, One config file to mon them, One config file to alert when they fail, Multiple ways to ack them. :-) Heh. I agree that mon's simplicity is a huge advantage. I'm using mon to stop certain services if a network connection fails. I do this by running a separate mon daemon on each machine. I suppose you could set up a separate Nagios on each machine, but wow, setting it up once is hard enough... Actually, we use a centralized Nagios to be sure that all our mons are up and running. So there's some cooperation as well. alex PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
* Alex Dean wrote: Heh. I agree that mon's simplicity is a huge advantage. I'm using mon to stop certain services if a network connection fails. I do this by running a separate mon daemon on each machine. I've though of doing something like that to restart services when they fail. I suppose you could set up a separate Nagios on each machine, but wow, setting it up once is hard enough... LOL. Actually, we use a centralized Nagios to be sure that all our mons are up and running. So there's some cooperation as well. I won't hold that against you. :-) Thats the beauty of open source, there is no one way to do stuff. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
They'll regret it. Maybe not today. Maybe not tomorrow. But soon, and for the rest of their life. On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Peter Wirdemo wrote: It's like an empty room here, I think they all went to the party at nagios ;-) /Peter Nathan Gibbs wrote: I just posted a new revision. I hope you all like it. ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
I just posted a new revision. I hope you all like it. -- Sincerely, Nathan Gibbs Systems Administrator Christ Media http://www.cmpublishers.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
Re: mon.cgi developement
* Anderson, Bill wrote: I don't know, but I'm willing to help, if anyone thinks of areas to improve on. Bill Anderson Technical Services Group Supporting the Department of Economic Development Information Technology Services Division MO Office of Administration I asked the question to find out what the state of things were. I didn't want to step on any toes. I have a revised version of mon.cgi at http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/ From our site Our customized version of the web UI that ships with the mon software. Many improvements including xhtml 1.0 output, CSS support, smaller size, a cleaner UI. Our company has used the software since 2003 made numerous changes to it for our benefit. Over the last two months I have reviewed documented these changes in addition to making documenting many more. We now offer them back to the Open Source Community. My changes or additions to the code are clearly marked, along with an explanation of why I did it. Deletions are not noted. I don't claim to know what I'm doing or to understand what the Eight Thing is for this software. However What I have done works for me. I hope you all like it. -- Sincerely, Nathan Gibbs Systems Administrator Christ Media http://www.cmpublishers.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
