Hi Jan,
Thanks for the clarifications.
However, from what you tell me know, I do wonder whether it would not be a
better idea to go for the sandbox approach. For me, it is not an issue of
performance, but of dependability.
Given this choice, maybe we should exctually decouple the pathfinder
comp
On 01/22/2007 01:43 PM, Peter Boncz wrote with possible deletions:
> Hi Jan,
>
> As I have indicated, use of the Boehm garbage collector inside the MonetDB
> process is not really an option.
>
> If algebra plans can only be compiled with Boehm, than it will become very
> difficult to use pathfin
Hi Jan,
As I have indicated, use of the Boehm garbage collector inside the MonetDB
process is not really an option.
If algebra plans can only be compiled with Boehm, than it will become very
difficult to use pathfinder inside MonetDB/XQuery.
Did you try the option with memory sandboxes that at c
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:32:42AM +0100, Henning Rode wrote:
> of course, we would like to be included in the binary packages. so we
> thought about negative consequences this might have for the rest of you...
> main point would be compilation on other machines. for the current
> version this look
of course, we would like to be included in the binary packages. so we
thought about negative consequences this might have for the rest of you...
main point would be compilation on other machines. for the current
version this looks good now (thanks to stefan). so, we don't see
problems for this rele
