[Mongrel] Mongrel timeout error

2009-01-14 Thread Ghost rider
My mongrel cluster seems to have some weird issues. Anyone here with some insight into whats going on? Tue Jan 13 09:36:34 -0800 2009: Reaping 7 threads for slow workers because of 'shutdown' Thread #Thread:0x2bb8adc8 sleep is too old, killing. Tue Jan 13 09:36:34 -0800 2009: Error calling

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel timeout error

2009-01-14 Thread benjamin grant
Recommended: http://www.informit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321544684 Specifically sections 3 and 4, on lsof and strace, the latter of which should be informative re: what the threads are doing when they're not responding to a shutdown, provided you can catch one in the act. Does this happen

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel timeout error

2009-01-14 Thread Dave Cheney
This is otherwise stock mongrel behaviour; it's just trying to comply with a shutdown request, and will forcibly kill threads that are unresponsive. Yup, you have one active request that is blocked on something (most likely the db, or a web services call). The standard mogrel shutdown

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel Timeout?

2007-11-21 Thread James Tucker
I would have expected you to be getting the following on load: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.9/lib/daemons/daemonize.rb:103:in `fork': fork() function is unimplemented on this machine (NotImplementedError) The -d is not actually supported on Windows, thus the warning: ** WARNING:

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel Timeout?

2007-11-21 Thread Oliver Schneider
Hi, thank you for your help. I didn't patch anything. There isn't much load on the server. Its something about a call to a label, every 20 or 30 seconds. Threre is enough Ram, that's not the problem. Cpu power is enough. I simply don't know why it stops working. In an older Mongrel version the

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel Timeout?

2007-11-21 Thread Evan Weaver
Incidentally that no method error 'w' is already fixed in trunk; we need some more test coverage of an unrelated change before we can make a release though. Evan On Nov 21, 2007 7:33 AM, Oliver Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, thank you for your help. I didn't patch anything. There