Hunter,
I would just install it without using ports, you can check out the
image_science page for info on how to compile with specific Mac OSX tips.
On 1/18/07, Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in trying ImageScience but I can't get FreeImage, the
processing lib, to
Yeah, I tried building it myself but got a similar compile error. I'm
on Intel but I assume that it works with both arches.
I'll go back and check it again... The OS X instructions weren't
working for me.
On Jan 19, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Michael D'Auria wrote:
Hunter,
I would just install it
This is the fixed version ...
Philippe Jayet wrote:
I've created a Debian package for ImageScience. It is not well tested
but works for me. If anyone is interested, I can upload it somewhere.
The package is for FreeImage, the ImageScience dependency !
Philippe J.
Hi~
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Surendra Singhi wrote:
Hi,
First of all thanks everyone for their responses.
On 1/18/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some linux distros have weird reporting of processes. I
have seen it
where top or ps will report 3 mongrels
On Jan 18, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Joey Geiger wrote:
Is mongrel not releasing the memory used for these operations? I need
to use send_file to stream some static images (4k max) (approved,
declined, etc) which rails then turns into new cached images. This
allows a group of people to get the
I'm interested in trying ImageScience but I can't get FreeImage, the
processing lib, to build on MacOS X 10.4 (Intel). Has anyone had luck?
I tried building from source and using DarwinPorts, both no dice:
gonzo:~/Unix/Sources/imagescience_stuff/FreeImage hunter$ sudo port
install freeimage
How are the mongrel started (cron, launchd, etc)? I had something
similar happen to me, but I think it was from the cluster being
started by root instead of the user I wanted to start it. It gave me
an extra set of mongrel processes running that mongrel_rails
cluster::stop wouldn't stop.
Michael
Is there anything you can do to force garbage collection in a case
like this? (loading in a few hundred records, or using send_file,
send_data?)
I already went through my application and removed RMagick (now using
mini-magick) but I'm still having monit restart a mongrel instance
every day
I am seeing this same problem on my debian production server. top
shows the correct number of processes, but each mongrel instance and
ruby running backgroundrb all are ballooning to 15% memory
consumption within a day or two. The application is http://
myfreecopyright.com
It may be in
Hi,
First of all thanks everyone for their responses.
On 1/18/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some linux distros have weird reporting of processes. I have seen
it
where top or ps will report 3 mongrels for each one that is really
running. And looking at your output you
10 matches
Mail list logo
