On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Kyle Kochis wrote:
LOL or IceDog.
Sounds like a good idea Filipe. I use Debian quite a bit but always
install ruby from source and use gems for all my extras like mongrel.
But for those that are afraid of compiling or want an easy way to
uninstall,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:09:33AM -0700, Kyle Kochis wrote:
Jens,
Good point, at least on the first two paragraphs but I must
respectfully (yet enthusiastically) disagree on the last point:
Besides that, it's just a waste of resources to compile anything on
*each* production machine in
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:01:59 -0200 (BRST)
Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally have time to answer this...
So, we have some favors to ask from you (the mongrel developers), as
those favors are not big things:
* Could you please upload tar.gz files together with your gems files?
As an
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jens Kraemer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:09:33AM -0700, Kyle Kochis wrote:
It's a known fact that a stable Debian lags somewhat behind the rest of
the world in terms of software versions, so if you pick it you have to
take that into account and be prepared to
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:01:59 -0200 (BRST)
Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally have time to answer this...
So, we have some favors to ask from you (the mongrel developers), as
those favors are not big things:
* Could you please upload tar.gz
And maybe people from OSX, SuSE, FreeBSD, Win32, Fedora, Gentoo (they have
some packages too) can benefit from the tar file too, don 't you think?
I don't know how they build systems works, so I cannot speak for them.
On FreeBSD I just grab the gem and install it for the user. On deinstall
Gentoo (they have
some packages too) can benefit from the tar file too, don 't you think?
I don't know how they build systems works, so I cannot speak for them.
the ebuild is almost totally empty, besides this line:
inherit ruby gems
im thinking they could proably factor this line into the
you might wnat to look into something similar. i like to think of the package
manager as a wrapper, not an un-networked custom unwrapper/rewrapper and hope
everything ends up back in the same box (and usually with competing version
numbers and optional modules it doesnt)
the other
On Fri Jan 12, 2007 at 04:14:06PM -0500, Jack Baty wrote:
While trying to debug a goofy XML loading issue in IE, I've found
that Mongrel (latest) returns Content-Type: 0 with every request on a
particular (CentOS 4) server, yet not on my local (OS X) box. These
both access identical
