Thanks, Zed, for mongrel :!)
I've been on TextDrive for some time running my sites behind apache
w/lighttpd. Once it got running it was cool enough. When it ran. And
there was still the webmin dance and all.
So I decided to set things up on my little dedicated redhat server -
since I'd had so
Oh well, needed a good subject, sounds funny enough?
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5475
Add automatic mongrel support to script/server
Status: closed, commited in rev #4486.
That is good news, right?
Ok, back to work, enoguh relax for me ;-)
--
Luis Lavena
Multimedia systems
-
Leaders
Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR application server besides that Made with %100 Ruby argument?Now, _that_ would make even more folks happy...
On 6/27/06, Zed Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:02 -0300, Luis Lavena wrote: Oh well, needed a good
On 2006-06-27 14:04:53 -0500, Berger, Daniel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM
To: mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails
On 6/27/06, Berger, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM
To: mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails
Interesting that LightTPD supersedes mongrel. I'd thing it'd be the
other way. Perhaps b/c mongrel doesn't yet output sql statements like
LightTPD?
On Jun 27, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Luis Lavena wrote:
Actually if mongrel is installed, will run with it, if not, will
default to webrick (like
Perhaps the crippling lack of keep-alive?
-Brian
On Jun 27, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Jamie Orchard-Hays wrote:
Interesting that LightTPD supersedes mongrel. I'd thing it'd be the
other way. Perhaps b/c mongrel doesn't yet output sql statements like
LightTPD?
On Jun 27, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Luis
