David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:
>> So, let's put this to the test:
>>
>> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
>
> I'm strongly in favor of this. Especially for core defaults like xml,
> atom, and rss. It would mean that Rails page caching would Just Work
> even for these
directory. When you reach 10-100K files in a single directory you
may notice the slowdown without a stopwatch. NetApp's own file
system was designed to have a constant access time regardless of the
number of files in the directory (that was their claim to fame anyway).
Bottom line is that I wo
On Dec 6, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
> I need people to answer a survey super quick for the next little
> release of Mongrel. Basically, nobody ever agrees on mime types,
> especially defaults, which is why Mongrel has none and you set your
> own. Sometimes people just refuse to s
Dallas,
One more thing to consider.
I remember doing research on file system management for common OS
choices a few years back. There was a paper published by someone at
NetApp R&D that analyzed the time it takes to open a file by name
when there are thousands of files in the same director
On 12/6/06, Zed A. Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need people to answer a survey super quick for the next little release of
> Mongrel. Basically, nobody ever agrees on mime types, especially defaults,
> which is why Mongrel has none and you set your own. Sometimes people just
> refuse to
On 12/6/06, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
I think this would be great. Just last week I added a mimes.yml file to my
application. Seems like adding a few more defa
On Dec 6, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
Yes I think this would be very useful. In production most of the
extra mime types are not needed because a front end web server
handles most filetypes. But in dev mode its nice to u
Thanks Konstantin,
We will give that a try (apache+mod_proxy). We try to cache everything
(using fragment caching) we can. Gets to be tens of thousands of files
quickly(never too many in one directory). It just seemed bizarre to us that
load goes way up periodically( and only recently) and tha
So, let's put this to the test:
1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
I'm strongly in favor of this. Especially for core defaults like xml,
atom, and rss. It would mean that Rails page caching would Just Work
even for these common caching types.
2) What should thos
>
> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
Yes, please!
> 2) What should those defaults be?
I'm fine with Apache's default list.
> 3) What should be the default mime type if a file doesn't match?
application/occtect-stream? But I really don't care.
> 3a) Where do you
On 12/6/06, Zed A. Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need people to answer a survey super quick for the next little release
of Mongrel. Basically, nobody ever agrees on mime types, especially
defaults, which is why Mongrel has none and you set your own. Sometimes
people just refuse to set thei
Not sure I have an answer to your question, but we are running
mongrel (x5) and apache 2.0 (mod_proxy_balancer) also separately from
the database, on a single 2-CPU low-end server with about 30K page
hits a day, with no caching at all, and the load on the box is nearly
zero all the time.
I
On 12/6/06, Zed A. Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types?
Yes. The hardcore folks who have opinions will probably want to customize
theirs anyway, but the people who don't care (probably the majority of
users) will appreciate having som
I need people to answer a survey super quick for the next little release of
Mongrel. Basically, nobody ever agrees on mime types, especially defaults,
which is why Mongrel has none and you set your own. Sometimes people just
refuse to set their own and want Mongrel to do everything for them, b
I'm running a site that gets ~30k to 40k page hits per day. In the last 4
days my mongrel processes have been jumping into high CPU usage a couple of
times a day to the point where my site becomes unresponsive (database on a
diff machine with no load). The only way for me to resolve the problem
Luis Lavena wrote:
> On 12/6/06, Daniel Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Luis Lavena wrote:
>>> Hello Users!,
>>>
>>> Since the pre-release 0.3.18 (last week) Lot of things happen in
>>> ruby-land (check the DoS security bulletin, please).
>>>
>>> Anyway, the win32 folks being left on the side
On 12/6/06, Brandon Keepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A hosting company has contacted me and is interested in providing
> Ruby on Rails hosting for their customers. They provide both
> dedicated and shared hosting. I know there are a lot of shared hosts
> that support Rails, but most of them (
A hosting company has contacted me and is interested in providing
Ruby on Rails hosting for their customers. They provide both
dedicated and shared hosting. I know there are a lot of shared hosts
that support Rails, but most of them (that I've seen) are using
mod_fastcgi, or a similar set
On 12/6/06, Berger, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Green
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:40 PM
> > To: mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
> > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] mongrel install on win32
On 12/6/06, frazer horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Luis
>
> One minor issue encountered thats a minor gotcha
>
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:in
> `require__': no such file to load --
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel_service-0.3.1
> /lib/mongrel_service/
On 12/6/06, Daniel Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Lavena wrote:
> > Hello Users!,
> >
> > Since the pre-release 0.3.18 (last week) Lot of things happen in
> > ruby-land (check the DoS security bulletin, please).
> >
> > Anyway, the win32 folks being left on the side of the road, and canno
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Green
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:40 PM
> To: mongrel-users@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Mongrel] mongrel install on win32 XP problems
>
>
> I have an MSDN subscription. Send me a solut
Hi Luis
One minor issue encountered thats a minor gotcha
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:in `require__':
no such file to load --
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel_service-0.3.1/lib/mongrel_service/init.rb
(LoadError)
from C:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubyge
Luis Lavena wrote:
> Hello Users!,
>
> Since the pre-release 0.3.18 (last week) Lot of things happen in
> ruby-land (check the DoS security bulletin, please).
>
> Anyway, the win32 folks being left on the side of the road, and cannot
> provide feedback of stability due lack of binaries for the la
24 matches
Mail list logo
