Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Thanks, Ezra. Apologies for not checking the whole thread. On Apr 8, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > Henry- > > That is what it quoted earlier in this email. Here is the monitrc > for one mongrel using mongrel_cluster: > > check process mongrel_USERNAME_5000 >with pidfile /data/USERNAME/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/ > USERNAME/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ > USERNAME/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --only 5000" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- > admin >group mongrel > > > You need one of those entries for each mongrel you need to run. > > Cheers- > -Ezra > > > On Apr 7, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Henry wrote: > >> Ezra, >> >> Would you mind sharing the portion of your monit.conf that handles >> the cluster? >> >> Many thanks, >> Henry >> >> >> On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: >> >>> >>> Yes mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better >>> job >>> of stopping mongrels. The problem I had when I used monit and >>> mongrel_rails without mongrel_cluster was that if a mongrel used too >>> much memory monit woudl not be able to stop it sometimes and so >>> execution woudl fail and timeout. >>> >>> Using mongrel_clutser avoids this problem completely. Trust me I've >>> tried it all different ways. I did monit without mongrel_cluster for >>> a about a full month on close to 200 servers and then switched them >>> all to monit and mongrel_cluster and get much better results. >>> >>> -Ezra >>> >>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 3:00 PM, snacktime wrote: >>> Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been the main issue so far? Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and backgrounding mongrel. Chris On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > >> Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? >> I'll >> be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, >> so it >> seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. >> >> Chris >> > > Chris- > > WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to > manage it. > You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the > best > configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If > your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about > 20-30% > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / > data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > 5000" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ > <%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > 5000" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the > sys- > admin >group mongrel > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / > data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > 5001" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ > <%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > 5001" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% f
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Henry- That is what it quoted earlier in this email. Here is the monitrc for one mongrel using mongrel_cluster: check process mongrel_USERNAME_5000 with pidfile /data/USERNAME/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/ USERNAME/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ USERNAME/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --only 5000" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin group mongrel You need one of those entries for each mongrel you need to run. Cheers- -Ezra On Apr 7, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Henry wrote: > Ezra, > > Would you mind sharing the portion of your monit.conf that handles > the cluster? > > Many thanks, > Henry > > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > >> >> Yes mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job >> of stopping mongrels. The problem I had when I used monit and >> mongrel_rails without mongrel_cluster was that if a mongrel used too >> much memory monit woudl not be able to stop it sometimes and so >> execution woudl fail and timeout. >> >> Using mongrel_clutser avoids this problem completely. Trust me I've >> tried it all different ways. I did monit without mongrel_cluster for >> a about a full month on close to 200 servers and then switched them >> all to monit and mongrel_cluster and get much better results. >> >> -Ezra >> >> On Apr 3, 2007, at 3:00 PM, snacktime wrote: >> >>> Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases >>> better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been >>> the main issue so far? >>> >>> Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more >>> reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and >>> backgrounding mongrel. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? > I'll > be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, > so it > seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. > > Chris > Chris- WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to manage it. You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about 20-30% check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / data/<% = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ <%= @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- admin group mongrel check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / data/<% = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/ <%= @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, cal
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Ezra, Would you mind sharing the portion of your monit.conf that handles the cluster? Many thanks, Henry On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > > Yes mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job > of stopping mongrels. The problem I had when I used monit and > mongrel_rails without mongrel_cluster was that if a mongrel used too > much memory monit woudl not be able to stop it sometimes and so > execution woudl fail and timeout. > > Using mongrel_clutser avoids this problem completely. Trust me I've > tried it all different ways. I did monit without mongrel_cluster for > a about a full month on close to 200 servers and then switched them > all to monit and mongrel_cluster and get much better results. > > -Ezra > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 3:00 PM, snacktime wrote: > >> Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases >> better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been >> the main issue so far? >> >> Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more >> reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and >> backgrounding mongrel. >> >> Chris >> >> On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: >>> Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? I'll be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. Chris >>> >>> Chris- >>> >>> WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to >>> manage it. >>> You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best >>> configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If >>> your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about >>> 20-30% >>> >>> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 >>>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >>>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / >>> data/<% >>> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >>> 5000" >>>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >>> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >>>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >>> restart # eating up memory? >>>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >>> alert # send an email to admin >>>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >>> restart# hung process? >>>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >>> restart # bad, bad, bad >>>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >>> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >>> admin >>>group mongrel >>> >>> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 >>>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid >>>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / >>> data/<% >>> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >>> 5001" >>>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >>> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >>>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >>> restart # eating up memory? >>>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >>> alert # send an email to admin >>>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >>> restart# hung process? >>>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >>> restart # bad, bad, bad >>>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >>> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >>> admin >>>group mongrel >>> >>> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 >>>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid >>>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C / >>> data/<% >>> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >>> 5002" >>>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >>> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >>>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >>> restart # eating up memory? >>>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >>> alert # send an email to admin >>>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >>> restart# hung process? >>>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >>> restart # bad, bad, bad >>>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >>> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >>> admin >>>group mongrel >>> >>> >>> I wen't for a while using my own scripts to start and stop >>> mongrel >>> without using mongrel_cluster. But it works more reliably when I use >>> mongrel_cluster and monit together. >>> >>> Cheers- >>> -- Ezra Zygmuntowi
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason it's not in mongrel is because bradley made the > mongrel_cluster gem and so Zed saw no reason to add the same stuff in > mongrel. > > I have asked for a --clean option for the mongel_rails command that > would cleanup PID"s but I haven't had time to make a patch, Same story here. I keep meaning to sit down and write that patch for the last 10 days or so. If you get there first, please ping me off-list. Another daemonization problem to look at is this: when there is no pid file, but the port is bound to some other process, 'mongrel_rails start' silently exits with exit code zero. Meantime, the .pid file is created a few seconds AFTER 'mongrel_rails start' is done. This is not as important as above, but kind of not right, and in the same area. Alex ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Zack Chandler wrote: > Ezra, > > The --clean option is only available in 1.0.1.1 beta I believe? Are > you finding it stable enough for production environments (EY)? > > I've been bitten by orphaned pids many times - I'm looking forward to > putting this into production... > Zack- Yes the prerelease is production worthy on linux, it still may have an issue on FreeBSD. If you are on linux then I highly recommend the upgrade. It is running fine on hundreds of servers no and works much better then any other way I've had this stuff setup. On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:32 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote: > On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job >> of stopping mongrels. > > Is there some fundamental reason why Mongrel itself cannot handle > these issues well, or does it just need more work in this area? > > Alex The reason it's not in mongrel is because bradley made the mongrel_cluster gem and so Zed saw no reason to add the same stuff in mongrel. I have asked for a --clean option for the mongel_rails command that would cleanup PID"s but I haven't had time to make a patch, especially since mongrel_cluster does a great job managing this stuff. Cheers- -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz -- Lead Rails Evangelist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job > of stopping mongrels. Is there some fundamental reason why Mongrel itself cannot handle these issues well, or does it just need more work in this area? Alex ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Ezra, The --clean option is only available in 1.0.1.1 beta I believe? Are you finding it stable enough for production environments (EY)? I've been bitten by orphaned pids many times - I'm looking forward to putting this into production... -- Zack Chandler http://depixelate.com On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job > of stopping mongrels. The problem I had when I used monit and > mongrel_rails without mongrel_cluster was that if a mongrel used too > much memory monit woudl not be able to stop it sometimes and so > execution woudl fail and timeout. > > Using mongrel_clutser avoids this problem completely. Trust me I've > tried it all different ways. I did monit without mongrel_cluster for > a about a full month on close to 200 servers and then switched them > all to monit and mongrel_cluster and get much better results. > > -Ezra > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 3:00 PM, snacktime wrote: > > > Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases > > better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been > > the main issue so far? > > > > Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more > > reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and > > backgrounding mongrel. > > > > Chris > > > > On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > >> > >>> Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? > >>> I'll > >>> be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it > >>> seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >> > >> Chris- > >> > >> WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to > >> manage it. > >> You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best > >> configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If > >> your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about > >> 20-30% > >> > >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 > >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid > >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > >> 5000" > >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" > >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > >> restart # eating up memory? > >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > >> alert # send an email to admin > >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > >> restart# hung process? > >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > >> restart # bad, bad, bad > >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- > >> admin > >>group mongrel > >> > >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 > >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid > >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > >> 5001" > >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" > >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > >> restart # eating up memory? > >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > >> alert # send an email to admin > >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > >> restart# hung process? > >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > >> restart # bad, bad, bad > >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- > >> admin > >>group mongrel > >> > >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 > >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid > >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only > >> 5002" > >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" > >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > >> restart # eating up memory? > >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > >> alert # send an email to admin > >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > >> restart# hung process? > >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > >> restart # bad, bad, bad > >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- > >> admin > >>group
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Yes mongrel_cluster handles the pid files. Also it does a better job of stopping mongrels. The problem I had when I used monit and mongrel_rails without mongrel_cluster was that if a mongrel used too much memory monit woudl not be able to stop it sometimes and so execution woudl fail and timeout. Using mongrel_clutser avoids this problem completely. Trust me I've tried it all different ways. I did monit without mongrel_cluster for a about a full month on close to 200 servers and then switched them all to monit and mongrel_cluster and get much better results. -Ezra On Apr 3, 2007, at 3:00 PM, snacktime wrote: > Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases > better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been > the main issue so far? > > Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more > reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and > backgrounding mongrel. > > Chris > > On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: >> >>> Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? >>> I'll >>> be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it >>> seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. >>> >>> Chris >>> >> >> Chris- >> >> WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to >> manage it. >> You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best >> configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If >> your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about >> 20-30% >> >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >> 5000" >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >> restart # eating up memory? >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >> alert # send an email to admin >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >> restart# hung process? >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >> restart # bad, bad, bad >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >> admin >>group mongrel >> >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >> 5001" >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >> restart # eating up memory? >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >> alert # send an email to admin >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >> restart# hung process? >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >> restart # bad, bad, bad >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >> admin >>group mongrel >> >> check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 >>with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid >>start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% >> = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only >> 5002" >>stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= >> @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >>if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then >> restart # eating up memory? >>if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then >> alert # send an email to admin >>if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then >> restart# hung process? >>if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then >> restart # bad, bad, bad >>if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then >> timeout # something is wrong, call the sys- >> admin >>group mongrel >> >> >> I wen't for a while using my own scripts to start and stop >> mongrel >> without using mongrel_cluster. But it works more reliably when I use >> mongrel_cluster and monit together. >> >> Cheers- >> -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz >> -- Lead Rails Evangelist >> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting >> -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) >> >> >> ___ >> Mongrel-users mailing list >> Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/l
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Makes sense that mongrel_cluster would handle a lot of edge cases better then monit. Is it mainly the pid file handling that has been the main issue so far? Have you tried daemontools? Seems to me like it would be more reliable since you wouldn't have to deal with pid files and backgrounding mongrel. Chris On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > > > Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? I'll > > be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it > > seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. > > > > Chris > > > > Chris- > > WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to manage it. > You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best > configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If > your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about > 20-30% > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > > I wen't for a while using my own scripts to start and stop mongrel > without using mongrel_cluster. But it works more reliably when I use > mongrel_cluster and monit together. > > Cheers- > -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz > -- Lead Rails Evangelist > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting > -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) > > > ___ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
I do pretty much the same thing with monit, except I don't use mongrel_cluster. Because monit needs to handle each instance of mongrel separately, I didn't see the point in using a clustering tool to handle single instances. It's a minor difference, really - specifying the mongrel_rails options in the monitrc file vs. the config/mongrel_cluster.yml file. Either way, I use monit to restart a mongrel cluster (or "group" as monit calls it). I'd say monit offers _more_ than mongrel_cluster, but I'm no expert. On 4/3/07, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > > > Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? I'll > > be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it > > seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. > > > > Chris > > > > Chris- > > WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to manage it. > You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best > configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If > your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about > 20-30% > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 >with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid >start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% > = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= > @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" >if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then > restart # eating up memory? >if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then > alert # send an email to admin >if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then > restart# hung process? >if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then > restart # bad, bad, bad >if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then > timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin >group mongrel > > > I wen't for a while using my own scripts to start and stop mongrel > without using mongrel_cluster. But it works more reliably when I use > mongrel_cluster and monit together. > > Cheers- > -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz > -- Lead Rails Evangelist > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting > -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) > > > ___ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > -- Cheers, Kevin Williams http://www.almostserio.us/ "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from Magic." - Arthur C. Clarke ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
Re: [Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, snacktime wrote: > Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? I'll > be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it > seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. > > Chris > Chris- WHen you use monit you can still use mongrel_cluster to manage it. You need the latest pre release of mongrel_cluster. This is the best configuration I've been able to come up with for 64Bit systems. If your on 32bit system then you can lower the memory limits by about 20-30% check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5000 with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5000.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5000" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin group mongrel check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5001 with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5001.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5001" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin group mongrel check process mongrel_<%= @username %>_5002 with pidfile /data/<%= @username %>/shared/log/mongrel.5002.pid start program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::start -C /data/<% = @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" stop program = "/usr/bin/mongrel_rails cluster::stop -C /data/<%= @username %>/current/config/mongrel_cluster.yml --clean --only 5002" if totalmem is greater than 110.0 MB for 4 cycles then restart # eating up memory? if cpu is greater than 50% for 2 cycles then alert # send an email to admin if cpu is greater than 80% for 3 cycles then restart# hung process? if loadavg(5min) greater than 10 for 8 cycles then restart # bad, bad, bad if 20 restarts within 20 cycles then timeout # something is wrong, call the sys-admin group mongrel I wen't for a while using my own scripts to start and stop mongrel without using mongrel_cluster. But it works more reliably when I use mongrel_cluster and monit together. Cheers- -- Ezra Zygmuntowicz -- Lead Rails Evangelist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
[Mongrel] monit vs mongrel cluster
Is there anything mongrel cluster gives you that monit doesn't? I'll be using monit to monitor a number of other services anyways, so it seems logical to just use it for everything including mongrel. Chris ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
