Hi Max,
You have to create a new MethodReference, with a declaring type being
the type of the parameter which is the nullable generic instance.
The best way to have something running, is to write what you want to
have as a result, read the assembly with Cecil, analyse the code that
is read and
Hi Dries,
On 6/19/07, Dries Vanoverberghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In MethodBody.cs, the methods SimplifyFromSByte/SimplifyFromByte cast
the operand of an instruction to a sbyte/byte. The operand is actually
an instruction, so the cast fails.
This should be fixed in svn.
I guess the
Hey,
On 6/19/07, Dries Vanoverberghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess MethodBody.Simplify should also transform the leave.s
instruction into a leave instruction.
and making the OpcodeType of OpCodes.Leave_S a OpCodeType.Macro
Fixed:
Hey Max,
On 6/21/07, Max Bolingbroke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, it's me again. You must be getting pretty bored of this by now, but
I'm having even more trouble with generics and Cecil.
No problem, I'm perfectly aware that the Generic side of Cecil for
that is way too complicated, but I'm
Hey,
On 6/23/07, Closer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I use SequencePoint property? Now it always returns null.
This as not been documented, because it's not completely done.
However, if you want to give it a try, you'll need to checkout the
/cecil module of Mono's SVN. You'll have to
Hey Mario,
On 7/5/07, Mario Carrión [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both AssemblyDefinition instances will contain the TypeDefinition
instances from those assemblies, but what about when I don't know the
local_assembly.dll path or the real GAC assembly name and version, is
there a way to let Cecil
Hey,
On 7/18/07, Wicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to load many assemblies with Cecil. It works perfect for
standard assemblies.
But for some non-standard assemblies, such as obfuscated by
Spices.net (http://www.9rays.net/Products/Spices.Net/),
there are some problems.
Could you
Hey,
On 7/18/07, Wicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another assembly which will fail Cecil, please download from
my site:
http://simpledotnet.googlepages.com/NineRays.FlyGrid.zip
Fixed in SVN.
--
Jb
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
Hey,
On 7/19/07, Wicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, this simple class:
public class Class1
{
[DefaultValue(DayOfWeek.Friday)]
public DayOfWeek TestProperty
{
get { return DayOfWeek.Friday; }
}
}
When I loaded the
Hey,
On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When i'm playing around with Mono.Cecil to rename properties, I have a
problem: After renaming the application doesn't work anymore.
What do you mean doesn't work anymore?
BEFORE
***
if (File.Exists(path))
{
Hi Charlie,
Nice to have you on the list.
On 7/23/07, charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just joined this list because I've been thinking about using Cecil
in NUnit, to replace most of the Reflection that is done to discover
tests. With .Net 2.0, load times became much greater, with most of
Hey Fabian,
On 7/23/07, Fabian Schmied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this should probably not be discussed here, but I just want to
mention that if your performance problems are in GetCustomAttributes,
there might also be an alternative in the System.Reflection namespace:
the
Cecil but found nothing. :((
You can get a PE binary by using
Image img = Image.GetImage (foo.dll);
Then you can have access to the pe structure, like the headers and the sections.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
be easy to write something like:
public static IQueryableT Query (this AssemblyDefinition assembly)
{
}
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
you the app directly, as apperently I can not add it
here.
Thanks for looking into it.
- Rasmus
On 8 Sep., 21:12, Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Rasmus,
Thanks for taking the time to analyse the issue.
Could you provide me with a test case reproducing your issue, so that
I
Hey,
On 11/9/07, JasonBock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this something that is not supported (yet) in Cecil 0.6? Or am I
missing something?
That usually works. Could you send your code to the list so we try to
see if something obvious is missing/wrong?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Man, of course.
On 11/27/07, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you post a code sample please?
foo (42);
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 12/10/07, Sanghyeon Seo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per IRC discussion, here is combined patch for add, dup, and stfld
instructions, complete with testcases.
And as said on IRC, this is good to go, and will be checked in today.
Thanks!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
want to do is to create a FieldReference,
with the approriate declaring type.
Looking at your code, the declaring type should be a
GenericInstanceType, with a GenericArgument being the GenericParameter
of the type Sample`1.
Generics are convoluted :)
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
);
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
on the ModuleDefinition
you're working on just after GetAssembly, and SaveSymbols just before
SaveAssembly.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
. Then you can emit what you've observed.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 1/9/08, Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cil.Emit (OpCodes.Call, typeof (Attribute).GetConstructor
(BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance, null,
Type.EmptyTypes, null));
Actually, you have to Import the result of GetConstructor for it to work.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
to get a link to it)
Glad you like it. If it's useful to you, maybe you could contribute
back a bit to the FAQ? That would be much appreciated.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
going to publish that somewhere?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Dude,
On 1/11/08, ursuletzu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the question is in the title...I need an example please
You're lucky I don't answer in the subject.
Clue, a TypeDefinition have a .Interfaces collection.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
the
attribute blob yourself?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
to my
mind). But it's ok, simply throw a NotSupportedException in that kind
of cases.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
) overload for that ldc.i4.s.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
//MycollectionTwo generated with
cecil
{
bool Contains(IMyInterface i)
{
base.Contains(i); //that's what I want :)
}
}
Here's you best chance to know what to generate. Compile that, open
the generated with Cecil, dump the object model, and here you are,
you'll know.
--
Jb Evain
Hey,
On 1/30/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please can you give me a c# code sample of how to add a specific
bitmap to an assembley as a resource?
As a managed resource, or as a win32 resource?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
with a fresh Cecil checkout from SVN?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
?
Yep, it's planned. I still have a few bug I want to kill and patch to
integrate before it happens though.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 2/4/08, hufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried fresh cecil from SVN and still no publickeytoken is being
defined. can you think of another problem i might have?
I'd need a repro to be able to fix it.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
property. So it should not be too hard
to get the instructions you want to change.
One thing though, is that Cecil doesn't (yet?) support replacing
instruction by a byte array.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 3/8/08, Wicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded it to http://wicky.hu.wq.googlepages.com/nhc.zip.
Could you help to have a look?
It's fixed in SVN.
Am getting really fed up by those obfuscated in a completely non sensical way.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 3/9/08, Oleksiy Gapotchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my file MonoCecilCLRFlags.patch for solving this bug:
I just checked your patch in, thanks!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
operand.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
change it to your own
implementation if you have it loaded before, so it doesn't get loaded
twice.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
framework.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 4/8/08, Liviu U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If saving the NEW assembly with cecil is impossible, is there a way to
patch the IL for some methods and save the original assembly ( without
interpreting it )?
For the second time, no :)
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Cecil gives you a more
advanced view on this.
* There's a lot of little details I'll let you dig that Cecil can
handle, and that System.Reflection can not.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
of a method call and its arguments.
Ideas?
See the code in /cecil/flowanalysis
You'll find there some code you could adapt to know the stack height
depending on the instruction.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
CustomAttribute.ConstructorParameters. However, I can't find a way to
access Default and Description. Is this possible?
Sure thing!
CustomAttribute ca = ...;
object def = ca.Properties [Default];
object des = ca.Properties [Description];
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
and the boolean value of value
Type.
You can create a TypeReference from a System.Type (a typeof expression
works) using module.Import.
You should read the FAQ:
http://www.mono-project.com/Cecil:FAQ
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono
would be to read the static constructor of
SimpleRepository, and analyze its method body to determine which
fields is associated to which factory method call.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 5/2/08, Scott Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MethodBody.Clone method doesn't hook up the new instructions' Next
and Previous properties.
This should be fixed in svn.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 5/12/08, Rune Glerup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came up with an even weirder example! (Again only weird when
compiled with the Visual C# compiler.)
Thanks for the example, I'll investigate.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 5/13/08, Rune Glerup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- targets [i] = GetInstruction
(body, nb, olds [i]);
+ targets [j] = GetInstruction
(body, nb, olds [j]);
Good catch, thanks!
--
Jb Evain
/tools/profiler
Very nice!
(but if it's not open source, it's not under the BSD, it's just closed source)
I've included my patch below. It simply postpones creating the table
until an actual constraint has been found to exist.
Amazing, thanks for the patch!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 5/20/08, ksaini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any solution???
Well yeah, it's a bug, so the solution is to fix it.
Could you provide a self-reproducable test case so it can get fixed quickly?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono
(A,
A.Manually.Patched.dll);
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 5/28/08, Jair Cazarin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about if instead of a field C.Tbase, I want to add a field of
FuncC.Tbase? How can I deal with this kind of generic type?.
Then you would have to create a proper instance of a
GenericInstanceType to be used as a field type.
--
Jb
Hey,
On 5/28/08, Alex Lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the source in the svn trunk was modified in revision 87804,
when adding MethodBody.Optimize(), an accidental change was made to
rename MethodBody.Simplify() to MethodBody.Modify().
Ah, good catch, thanks!
--
Jb Evain
Hey,
On 6/6/08, olerysc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it bug? or - does it have some reasons, which i don't know?
Looks like a bug to me.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 6/9/08, emvy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I have to tell that the problem occurs in a situation when a
generic method returns an array of its generic parameters.
Could you please provide a test case?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 6/11/08, emvy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the solution. I'll send you the fix as soon a I get approval
for that (company policies rule ;) )
Cool :)
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 7/7/08, akhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get typereference of bool ?
The easy way:
TypeReference bool_type = target_module_definition.Import (typeof (bool));
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
that there's no
problem for you to use this code in your project :).
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
will
result in changing the name of the type, and thus, as Cecil tries to
maintain some type integrity, all things pointing to this type will
see the change.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 7/10/08, Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there actually a way to do that, except going throug the whole
inheritance tree?
Nope.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
in svn.
6. When will the Framework 3,5 format be fully supported?
Huh ?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 7/21/08, Rune Glerup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bug, or have I overlooked some of the semantics of
constraints on generic parameters?
It's a bug.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
, it all worked perfectly.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 7/10/08, John Klenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and example to realization from Microsoft.Cci:
Please don't send decompiled close sources programs to this list.
Anyway, this bug should be fixed in svn.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and annotate the objects, to know whether they
could be removed or not.
So it's for you to use.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
?
Yep.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 9/4/08, spiderM9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The little driver program I wrote sets up a visitor, but the failure
occurs very early inside AssemblyFactory.GetAssembly.
Ok, this is fixed in svn.
Thanks,
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
:
var method = new MethodDefinition (name, attributes, null);
var genericParam = new GenericParameter (T, method);
method.GenericParameters.Add (genericParam);
method.ReturnType.ReturnType = genericParam;
Not very elegant, I admit.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
. [token:0x0003]
[MD]: Error: GenericParam is out of sequence by number. [token:
0x2A01
Any idea what that means? Thanks for your help, btw!
Am not sure. Do you have a test case I could run?
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono
Hey Juerg,
On 3/20/08, Juerg Billeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debugging rewritten assemblies in Visual Studio seems to work quite well
with the attached patches applied.
Finally, your patch is commited.
Thanks!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 10/27/08, Lotfi Gheribi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your right, its MethodBody.Optimize
Well, .Simplify decomposes every macro opcode to its full form (br.s
- br), and optimize try to recompose the macros opcodes if possible
(br - br.s if the jump offset doesn't overflow).
--
Jb Evain
verification (by using sn -Vu), it may work. But it has
never been tested afaik.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
completely sure, all those types have an umnaged counter part,
so if you modify the managed part, the other will break for sure.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ILDASM/ILASM... the
resulting assembly DOES work
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
instead of a
tool?
thanks
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 11/6/08, Romain Verdier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, is there a better way to achieve such an operator lookup?
Not as is. The current GetMethod story sucks terribly. I'll add that
to my todo list.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 11/6/08, Wicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you think the last byte is useless because it should be unicode,
but I find it is important.
Yeah :)
I'll revert my last patch and look for a better solution. Thanks for
the head up.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey,
On 11/11/08, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems Cecil (latest svn) has problems to handle try-catch blocks
with generic exception handling correctly.
This sould be fixed in svn.
Thanks!
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED
CorSigCompressSignedInt). But I don't think it's legal to copy the SSCLI
implementation because of the license restrictions.
It's definitely not legal, and now you're pretty much tainted. I won't
be able to accept any of your contributions to Cecil about metadata
signatures you could make.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL
assembly, or you generating wrong code.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
injecting code, and then calling .Optimize () afterwards.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 11/26/08, Steve Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jb thanks for the answer! I will try this, but can i open and change
an assembly which is compiled into memory this way?
You can not modify an already loaded assembly and load it back in its AppDomain.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL
intefarces (IList, ICollection,
IEnumerable) to the type definition.
Some compilers don't do that, so you have to walk its hierarchy to
browse all the interfaces the type actually implement.
--
Jb Evain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
with Cecil and check the constructor parameters of the class
Lucene.Net.Highlight.Highlighter. The bug isn't easy to reconstruct
but there is the same issue with several other assemblies as well.
Thanks for the repro, I'll have a look.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
On 12/17/08, Richard Flamsholt richard.flamsh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 Dec., 14:46, Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr wrote:
Sure. I just need sample assemblies.
No problem. I'll mail you one straight away.
Thanks!
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
in.
Thanks,
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
generic
parameter. So it sometimes can be tricky to get things right.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
and Cecil.Mdb.
Happy new year and hope the neighbor's dog get silent soon :-)
Happy new year!
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 1/5/09, Daniel Cazzulino kzu@gmail.com wrote:
maybe I should just instantiate an ArrayList :p
I can repro it now. Let me see if I can fixicate it quickly.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
(__Interceptor,
type, interceptorRef);
Why don't you pass the definition directly to ldfld? A FieldDefinition
is a FieldReference, so it works if you use the Definition in the
assembly it's defined in.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 1/5/09, Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr wrote:
I can repro it now. Let me see if I can fixicate it quickly.
That should be fixed in svn (the anonsvn will be updated in less than
30min from now).
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
add the newly created
FieldReference to the .MemberReferences of the module. Painful, I know
:)
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
= il.Create(OpCodes.Newobj, objectRef);
Aren't your extensions methods duplicating the Import code?
I mean, you can do:
var type_obj = module.Import (typeof (object));
Does that work for you?
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
TypeReference.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hey,
On 1/6/09, Lotfi Gheribi gheri...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please tell me if is there any chance this could be fixed ?
Sorry I did not followed up, but it should be fixed with yesterday's
patch. Could you try and give it a try?
Thanks,
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
Hey Group,
I've recently updated the page «Projects Using Cecil» on the Google
Group. If you're aware of projects that I'm not, please help list them
here. Alternatively, you can answer to this mail, and I'll add them
myself.
Thanks,
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
in the Import method. Reflection gives you a
completely closed method for you to invoke it, but the Import code
should deal with that.
--
Jb Evain j...@nurv.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
--
mono-cecil
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
1 - 100 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
