ailing List
<mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net>
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
Hmm, the question is if the System.Reflection.Metadata.dll wasn't updated in
Roslyn yet or there's some other issue. Marek might now more about it.
On 2 Feb 2018, at 20:17, Neale Ferguson
<ne.
18 14:17
To: Alexander Köplinger; Jo Shields
Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian” exception.
If I remember correctly the issue was fixed in System.Reflection.Metadata.dll
but Roslyn still needed to pick up the fixed ve
Hmm, the question is if the System.Reflection.Metadata.dll wasn't updated in
Roslyn yet or there's some other issue. Marek might now more about it.
On 2 Feb 2018, at 20:17, Neale Ferguson
> wrote:
Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian”
Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian” exception.
If I remember correctly the issue was fixed in System.Reflection.Metadata.dll
but Roslyn still needed to pick up the fixed version. That might have happened
in the meantime, best to just try :)
t: Friday, February 2, 2018 12:49:45 PM
To: Jo Shields; Alexander Köplinger
Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
I assume System.Reflection.Metadata.dll is still housed at Microsoft and the
big-endian fix for it that enables Roslyn to run is still to sur
: Jo Shields; Alexander Köplinger
Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
I assume System.Reflection.Metadata.dll is still housed at Microsoft and the
big-endian fix for it that enables Roslyn to run is still to surface?
From: Jo Shields <joshi...@microsoft.c
018 12:06
To: Neale Ferguson
Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List; Jo Shields
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
Hm, that's a packaging question for Jo (added on CC).
On 2 Feb 2018, at 18:03, Neale Ferguson
<ne...@sinenomine.net<mailto:ne...@sinenomine.net>> wrote:
What’s the propos
to:mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net>>
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core
Ahh, sorry, you're talking about the mono-core.spec :D
Yes, replacing .pdb there should work. I guess we can take that improvement as
well?
On 2 Feb 2018, at 17:41, Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
<m
Hey Neale, would you mind opening a pull request on GitHub with the BTLS
changes for s390x?
Could you please list which pdb's it complains about?
- Alex
On 1 Feb 2018, at 21:44, Neale Ferguson
> wrote:
Hi,
I found the 5.8 src rpm (thanks