Re: [Mono-devel-list] Embedding Mono in a Virtual World

2005-03-19 Thread Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
You might be able to cook up something with serializable objects and lightweight threads based on generators (yield) But this is just food for though... On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:30:31 + (GMT), Jim Purbrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to save and load mono stacks? I'm

Re: [Mono-devel-list] Preparing the 1.1.5 release.

2005-03-19 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello, Hello, miguel. I am preparing the 1.1.5 release; Please let me know what features should be highlighted in this new release since our 1.1.4 release. ___ New

Re: [Mono-devel-list] Issue to allocate more than 1Gb of memory with mono

2005-03-19 Thread Zoltan Varga
Hi, This is now tracked as: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=73882 Zoltan On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:55:35 +0100 (MET), Joannes Vermorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running mono on a bi-AMD64 machine with 8Gb of memory under linux

Re: [Mono-devel-list] patents

2005-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Knight
Only Miguel or a Novell official can speak about Mono and patents. I probably I misinterpreted this: why isn't anyone free to speak about Mono and patents? Mono is GPL'd -- why would a Novell official be in a better position than anyone else? Jeff On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:06:38 -0800 (PST),

Re: [Mono-devel-list] Preparing the 1.1.5 release.

2005-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Knight
This shouldn't exactly be highlighted, but mono = 1.1.4 will not build from the tarball on linuxppc on a G3. Granted, this is quite obscure. But it might be worth mentioning as a known issue. Jeff http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=72824 On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:53:18 -0500, Miguel de