Re: [Mono-devel-list] Re: Patch: 100% working mono under FreeBSD (small nit)

2005-04-12 Thread Bill Middleton
On Apr 12, 2005 12:32 AM, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Preview=yes will become the new default. Ah. Thanks for the clarification. I guess the logic will have to be reversed in that test. And speaking of PREVIEW, I've been getting some strange errors lately when building the 2.0

RE: [Mono-devel-list] PATCH: reworked async IO for Socket

2005-04-12 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, They don't really have to be - there are plenty of examples of how to wrap them up to create a virtual layer that *is* portable. You only need 'one of' these technologies on any given platform, and configure can take care of the rest. Given the effectiveness of P/Invoke and

[Mono-devel-list] Patch: System.Diagnostics tests

2005-04-12 Thread Bill Middleton
While working to get mono up and running on FreeBSD, I discovered that there were no tests for System.Diagnostics which were being run. There are, however, a couple of tests in the group which use System.Diagnostics, but they weren't as portable as they could have been, and lacked information for

[Mono-devel-list] mono_jit_cleanup / mono_jit_init

2005-04-12 Thread Joe Ante
Hi, Is there any particular reason why calling mono_jit_init then mono_jit_cleanup and then mono_jit_init again causes an abort? Would be really nice to be able to unload mono after you are done with a task and don't need it anymore. Joachim Ante www.otee.dk

Re: [Mono-devel-list] mono_jit_cleanup / mono_jit_init

2005-04-12 Thread Zoltan Varga
Hi, It would be nice but it is very hard to do. Neither the Sun VM nor the MS VM can be unloaded. Zoltan On Apr 12, 2005 7:00 PM, Joe Ante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any particular reason why calling mono_jit_init then

[Mono-devel-list] New io-layer merged.

2005-04-12 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Dick's new daemon-less io-layer for Mono has been checked into the main branch on SVN. It went through extensive testing before it was merged into the main branch. If you track SVN, please use this new version and help us debug any kinks that might be there. Miguel.

RE: [Mono-devel-list] PATCH: reworked async IO for Socket

2005-04-12 Thread James Mansion
Anyway, I'll do the aio_* thing and add epoll and kqueue with the lowest priority to my queue. Patches for these are welcome. My understanding is that the behaviour of aio with sockets (and presumably pipes) is NOT (well) specified by POSIX. And that the implementations reflect this in their

[Mono-devel-list] Re: New io-layer merged.

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Jordan
Hi Miguel, Dick's new daemon-less io-layer for Mono has been checked into the main branch on SVN. It went through extensive testing before it was merged into the main branch. If you track SVN, please use this new version and help us debug any kinks that might be there. I got a lot of