RE: [Mono-dev] Controls in HTML comment block behave different in .Net and Mono

2006-02-06 Thread Arnhoffer Károly
The Src directive won't work for me. I get compilation errors under both Mono and .Net (attached). (K) -Original Message- From: peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 6:57 PM To: Arnhoffer Károly Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-dev]

RE: [Mono-dev] Ldap and Threading

2006-02-06 Thread Konstantin Triger
Hello, Attached is a patch based on the Mike and JD patches. The patch actually increases compliancy with the original jldap, as there MessageVector inherits from Vector, which is a synchronized collection in Java. Please review and verify before commit. Regards, Konstantin Triger

[Mono-dev] Issue with resgen

2006-02-06 Thread Gavin Hamill
Hi :) Just having a strange error, repeatable on both 1.1.9 and 1.1.13.2: test:~# resgen /compile Localisation.resx Error: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. Inner exception: Failed to read past end of stream. Source file available at http://bum.net/Localisation.resx -

Re: [Mono-dev] Issue with resgen

2006-02-06 Thread Robert Jordan
Hey, Hi :) Just having a strange error, repeatable on both 1.1.9 and 1.1.13.2: test:~# resgen /compile Localisation.resx Error: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. Inner exception: Failed to read past end of stream. Source file available at

[Mono-dev] Re: Xml serialization: wrong enum name encoding

2006-02-06 Thread Lluis Sanchez
The patch looks ok to me. Thanks. El dom, 05-02-2006 a las 10:06 -0800, Konstantin Triger escribió: Hi Lluis, We wrongly encode enum names, what causes this WebMethod to fail to consume: public enum MyEnum { ///remarks/

[Mono-dev] System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses()

2006-02-06 Thread Jonathan S. Chambers
I'm using the System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses() method on mono on Linux. The only process it returns me is the currently executing managed app (ProcessTest.exe for example). Is this correct (I was expecting all processes on the machine)? This is the behavior as a regular user and

Re: [Mono-dev] System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses()

2006-02-06 Thread Carlos Solorzano
On: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77196 they mention another bug about it. Doesn't sound like its going to get fixed anytime soon, I went with reading /proc which worked out better because I needed to know if something was a zombie as well. --Carlos On Feb 6, 2006, at 9:02 AM,

Re: [Mono-dev] System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses()

2006-02-06 Thread mike . hull
Carlos Solorzano wrote: On: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77196 they mention another bug about it. Doesn't sound like its going to get fixed anytime soon, I went with reading /proc which worked out better because I needed to know if something was a zombie as well. --Carlos On

RE: [Mono-dev] Ldap and Threading

2006-02-06 Thread Mike Glenn
Konstantin, Thanks for working this up, I'll test it as soon as I can! I'm under some deadline pressure at the moment so it may take a day or two till I can get to it. I'll let you know as soon as I do. Mike Glenn Hello, Attached is a patch based on the Mike and JD patches. The patch

Re: [Mono-dev] System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses()

2006-02-06 Thread Carlos Solorzano
Thanks for the code, thats gonna come in very handy, very handy! I was just checking if the directory existed and reading the status to see if it was a Zombie, but this is much better. --Carlos On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carlos Solorzano wrote: On:

Re: [Mono-dev] proper way to upgrade mono installation?

2006-02-06 Thread Jonathan Resnick
I was able to install the rpms in mono-1.1.zip and gtk-sharp-1.0.zip using the rpm -Uvh *.rpm method. However, when I tried to install rpms in gtk-sharp-2.0.zip, I get the following errors: Preparing...### [100%] file

[Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r56597 - trunk/mcs/class/System.XML/Test/System.Xml.Schema]

2006-02-06 Thread Atsushi Eno
Gert, Please revert this patch which is done without any agreement. There is a reason I marked it as NotWorking - it is for compatibility kids. I am not likely to fix this trivial stuff soon, but someone might notice the impl. difference from it. Marking NotDotNet is clearly wrong: we do not

RE: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r56597- trunk/mcs/class/System.XML/Test/System.Xml.Schema]

2006-02-06 Thread Gert Driesen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2006 4:02 To: Gert Driesen Cc: mono-devel mailing list Subject: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r56597- trunk/mcs/class/System.XML/Test/System.Xml.Schema]