After some discussions with Mark we decided to do a few changes to Mono.Simd
and
it would be really nice to have some feedback from everyone on them.
One of the motivation is that the current C# of Mono.Simd is not endianess
safe and doesn't
work as expected on platforms such as ppc. The other is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:mono-devel-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rodrigo Kumpera
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:19 AM
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: [Mono-dev] Incoming changes to Mono.Simd
After some discussions with Mark
The second issue is a limitation of the C# language,
which require extension methods to be defined of sealed classes. This would
mean that code written against mono 2.2 version
of Mono.Simd might not compiler with newer versions.
Well, I'd vote for using the method which is *cleaner* and
I also had this problem.
I installed libncurses5-dev on Ubuntu and it worked.
j
Alexander M. Batishchev wrote:
Hello!
I'm windows developer and new for Linux, that's why I cannot resolve next
problem. Help me a bit, please.
Debian's repository contains only Monodevelop 1.0. I want to
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Alan McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Out of interest, why do we use static methods currently rather than
instance methods? Would using instance methods instead of extension
methods complicate things jit-wise, as API-wise it'd be essentially
the same.
Yes,
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:24 +, Alan McGovern wrote:
Out of interest, why do we use static methods currently rather than
instance methods? Would using instance methods instead of extension
methods complicate things jit-wise, as API-wise it'd be essentially
the same.
Then there's
Extension methods are great for simplifying the API, but Mono.Simd should
still be usable by C# 2.0 programs.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hello Mark!
The MIPS port is coming along nicely. Hello, World! now works, the tests
in basic.exe all pass if run manually and not by using the reflection
technique that the test harness normally uses. There's still a lot to do
- a lot of the logic that was in the old style brg files for MIPS
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 02:26 +0200, StApostol wrote:
Extension methods are great for simplifying the API, but Mono.Simd
should still be usable by C# 2.0 programs.
Silly question, but why? Since Mono.Simd will only be accelerated under
Mono, and Mono supports C# 3, I don't see much use for the
