pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
Hi,
I think the new preview is able to correctly locate platform in Mac
(before mono thought it was Unix) and now NAnt fails:
NAnt currently does not support this platform (MacOSX, ID = 6).
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.mono.general/35834
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the attached Program.cs.
2008-12-17 Bill Holmes billholme...@gmail.com
* ListViewItem.cs (ListViewSubItem.ctor): Initalizing the
SubItemStyle member field.
Contributed under MIT/X11 license.
-bill
class Program
{
static void
I wrote a test for this, and committed both in r121709.
Thanks!
Jonathan
Bill Holmes wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the attached Program.cs.
2008-12-17 Bill Holmes billholme...@gmail.com
* ListViewItem.cs (ListViewSubItem.ctor): Initalizing the
SubItemStyle
Cross-posting from CruiseControl.Net devel group. Is there any chance
of this patch making it into Mono 2.2?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Alex a.alex.hut...@gmail.com wrote:
Will that patch make the next release of Mono then?
On Dec 17, 9:54 am, Leszek Ciesielski skol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the new preview is able to correctly locate platform in Mac
(before mono thought it was Unix) and now NAnt fails:
NAnt currently does not support this platform (MacOSX, ID = 6).
Thomas Wiest escribió:
Hey Everyone,
We've just released Mono 2.2 Preview 3 today!
Preview 3
Hi,
I've recently discovered a bug in the Dictionary class.
After really fast insertions (ca. 9000-1000) and some removals in between it
crashes with
UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception
has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---
Looking good, but three issues need fixing before we can commit:
1. Formatting. There are still numerous cases where there isn't a space
before the opening parenthesis.
2. UnixSignal tests that use RealTimeSignum should remain in the
UnixSignalTest class, as these are still testing UnixSignal
May be it's another sign to reconsider having JDBC stack for database
connectivity, at least for OleDb namespace.
It's already a long time that ikvm is based on OpenJDK and therefore can be
considered as very solid and compliant.
Taking the Mainsoft System.Data connectivity stack on top of JDBC
For the record, I figured out the root cause for the Illegal
Instruction. Openembedded when it builds ARM kernels turns off
CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT (automatically) as a performance optimization if it
detects you are building with a EABI toolchain, etc. So unless I'm
missing something, at this time
Thanks Jon,
Attached is another pass at this. Just one point below that I couldn't address
as suggested:
+#if NET_2_0
+: IEquatable RealTimeSignum
+#endif
+ {
+ private int rt_offset;
+ public static readonly RealTimeSignum MinValue
Filed under https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948.
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 20:58:50 Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On 12/17/2008 10:55 AM, Arno Rehn wrote:
Hi,
I've recently discovered a bug in the Dictionary class.
After really fast insertions (ca. 9000-1000) and some
On 12/17/2008 10:55 AM, Arno Rehn wrote:
Hi,
I've recently discovered a bug in the Dictionary class.
After really fast insertions (ca. 9000-1000) and some removals in between it
crashes with
UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception
has been thrown by the
Hi,
You did a great job at implementing support for this functionality but
I'm afraid that this very functionality is not supported by MS.NET either.
The difference seems to be in terminating the background threads on exit
rather that in socket handling.
Please see the attached test case
Kornél,
I tested your case and it appears to work fine with my changes. I
believe that this is because I check for the ThreadState_StopRequested
state. I do not check for ThreadState_AbortRequested. That is
intentional because that is the behavior I observed with MS .net.
Also if I understand
Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Il giorno mar, 16/12/2008 alle 01.27 +0100, Tobi ha scritto:
Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs page, AND
reply
to this thread with the bug numbers so we can track them:
Found another runtime bug - #459285:
And
Tobi wrote:
Thomas Wiest wrote:
Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs page, AND reply
to this thread with the bug numbers so we can track them:
Found another runtime bug - #459285:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459285
I added this to the list
Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
2008/12/16 Dan Shechter d...@houmus.org:
Thomas Wiest wrote:
Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs page, AND
reply to this thread with the bug numbers so we can track them:
Pete Erickson wrote:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459432
I added this to the list of bugs we're tracking for 2.2. It's really
late in the release cycle, so this might not make it into the final
release.
We appreciate the report! :)
Thomas
Thanks! We're looking forward to a regression free release!
Otherwise, why release? ;)
- Steve
--
Steve G. Bjorg
http://mindtouch.com
http://twitter.com/bjorg
On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Thomas Wiest wrote:
Pete Erickson wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo