Re: [Mono-dev] [patch] mono inline

2009-02-17 Thread Jerry Maine
the .cs file is the really simple (and dumb) program that I used to get this info from mono runtime. As always... this is released under MIT\X11 license. [based on revision(trunk) 127107] With patch in method-to-ir.c time mono --compile-all test.exe real0m0.151s user0m0.084s sys

Re: [Mono-dev] Updating the ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib shipped with Mono

2009-02-17 Thread Leszek Ciesielski
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Mirco Bauer mee...@meebey.net wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:48:33 +0100 Leszek Ciesielski skol...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, would it be possible to update the ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib Mono bundles? There's a lot of bugfixes (

Re: [Mono-dev] gmcs and The Future

2009-02-17 Thread Jérémie Laval
This sounds like the macro system discussed here : http://cheddar.wik.is/Macro_system. Anyway, better to brainstorm on the wiki now than the mailing list imho ;-) . -- Jérémie Laval jeremie.la...@gmail.com http://garuma.wordpress.com 2009/2/17 Stefan Noack noackste...@googlemail.com Hi,

Re: [Mono-dev] Generic Variance

2009-02-17 Thread Scott Peterson
This patch improves the test code. Index: mono/metadata/ChangeLog === --- mono/metadata/ChangeLog (revision 127124) +++ mono/metadata/ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +2009-02-17 Scott Peterson lunchtimem...@gmail.com + +

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 2...

2009-02-17 Thread Thomas Wiest
Christian Prochnow wrote: Hi List, any chance of getting rid of this bug in 2.4 release ? https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473303 Added and has been fixed. It'll be part of Mono 2.4p3. Thomas ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 2...

2009-02-17 Thread Thomas Wiest
Brad Taylor wrote: Hey Thomas, Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs page, AND reply to this thread with the bug numbers so we can track them: http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs Please add: Bug 473343 - [Regression] WebBrowser becomes unresponsive after Navigate

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 2...

2009-02-17 Thread Thomas Wiest
Kornél Pál wrote: Hi, Could you please track this as well: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467201 Added, thanks! :) Thomas ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

[Mono-dev] MSBuild in the 3.5 Profile

2009-02-17 Thread Jonathan Chambers
Hello All, I am working on some things in xbuild and the Microsoft.Build.* namespaces. MS ships a 3.5 version of the Microsoft.Build.* assemblies and a 3.5 version of MSBuild. I started looking at adding our corresponding assemblies to the 3.5 profile. I think I can manage that (and will send a

[Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread Thomas Wiest
Hey Everyone, We've just released Mono 2.4 Preview 3 today! Please help us out by giving it a try with your applications. As always, you can get the preview/RC releases here: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs

Re: [Mono-dev] MSBuild in the 3.5 Profile

2009-02-17 Thread Rafael Teixeira
3.5 added quite a few new features and some small changes in behavior, it would be nice to have a 2.0 profile for xbuild, for those like me still working with multiple VS.NET installations and projects (2003,2005,2008) in the same machine, and subversion repo. Some of them are planned to be ported

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread Sandy Armstrong
Here is a really nasty regression that affects basically every GTK# app (MonoDevelop and Tomboy, at least) on Linux and Mac OS X: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 This regression is due to some change in the mono-2-4 branch in the last two weeks. I have tried various

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread David Mitchell
I found this one today: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476811 --Dave Thomas Wiest wrote: Hey Everyone, We've just released Mono 2.4 Preview 3 today! Please help us out by giving it a try with your applications. As always, you can get the preview/RC releases here:

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:29:29 -0700 Thomas Wiest twi...@novell.com wrote: The earlier you file the bugs and reply to this message, the more likely your bugs will get fixed. Special attention is given to regressions, so if you can tell us a version of Mono where the bug worked and you add

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread Paul
Hi, Here is a really nasty regression that affects basically every GTK# app (MonoDevelop and Tomboy, at least) on Linux and Mac OS X: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Not seeing that here (using Fedora rawhide with svn tarballs built in the last 2 hours). Everything is

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 3...

2009-02-17 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
2009/2/17 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk Hi, Here is a really nasty regression that affects basically every GTK# app (MonoDevelop and Tomboy, at least) on Linux and Mac OS X: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Not seeing that here (using Fedora rawhide with svn

Re: [Mono-dev] ASP.NET MVC

2009-02-17 Thread Atsushi Eno
No and no. To not repeat this question from time to time, you can check our SVN repository for class libraries: http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/mcs/class/ If there is System.Web.Mvc, then it's likely started. Atsushi Eno Dan Cirnat wrote: I see that the MVC implementation is

Re: [Mono-dev] ASP.NET MVC

2009-02-17 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I see that the MVC implementation is planned for june. I'd like to know if there is someone responsible for this and if any progress is made. We tend to only work on published APIs to not waste a lot of our time, so we have only implemented the System.Web.Routing components right now.

Re: [Mono-dev] MSBuild in the 3.5 Profile

2009-02-17 Thread Miguel de Icaza
I am working on some things in xbuild and the Microsoft.Build.* namespaces. MS ships a 3.5 version of the Microsoft.Build.* assemblies and a 3.5 version of MSBuild. I started looking at adding our corresponding assemblies to the 3.5 profile. I think I can manage that (and will send a patch