Hi guys,
Im looking at Mono Ninject2 compatibility and Ive come across a problem.
Nate has a bunch of tests to check his dispose code (example below). For
this purpose we need a way to force disposing of unused objects. Currently
the tests use GC.Collect() for that, however on mono that doesnt
Hi
I have translated mcs.pot [1] to brazilian portuguese. Should I send
my translation by the Bugzilla? I'm asking because I didn't see any
categories for l10n there.
Thanks in advance
[1] http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/mono/po/mcs/
--
Rodrigo L. M. Flores
Computer Science
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
Yes, open should be more atomic, feel free to contribute a patch that
fixes this issue.
Attached are the patches.
The nunit tests succeed fine.
From a18d38c74ab47267bba69cae9596477fcedd1f9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas andr...@blacklight.(none)
Date: Sun, 1
Hi,
I don't know if there's a more suitable place to send this, if so,
please let me know.
I was trying today the sample on the Mono Zeroconf
(http://www.mono-project.com/Mono.Zeroconf) page.
Well, I run it on my OpenSuse box, but the client (nor mzclient) can't
see the registered service...
.
diff -urN mono-svn-20090301/mono/mono/mini/mini-ppc.c
mono-svn/mono/mono/mini/mini-ppc.c
--- mono-svn-20090301/mono/mono/mini/mini-ppc.c 2009-03-01 08:37:35.0
-0600
+++ mono-svn/mono/mono/mini/mini-ppc.c 2009-03-01 17:28:48.0 -0600
@@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
*/
#include mini.h
#include
