Re: [Mono-dev] CoreCLR patches

Hi Sebastien, Apart from what Rodrigo said I only two tiny issues with the patch. First it would be nice if you could split it up between the part that handles field access, the part that handles wrappers and the part that handles the image stuff. And then there's this: + for (i = 0; i

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Debugger on Windows Patch

Hi, the patch looks good, can you please commit ? Martin On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 00:43 -0400, Jonathan Chambers wrote: Hello, Another patch, containing all the changes for the GnuReadLine - LineReader abstraction. Thanks, Jonathan On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Jonathan

Re: [Mono-dev] CoreCLR patches

Hello Mark, On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:58 +0100, Mark Probst wrote: Hi Sebastien, Apart from what Rodrigo said I only two tiny issues with the patch. First it would be nice if you could split it up between the part that handles field access, the part that handles wrappers and the part that

Re: [Mono-dev] CoreCLR patches

Hey Sebastien, Now one thing remains unanswered, could you share your lights on:           static gboolean          method_is_safe (MonoMethod *method)          {         -    /*         +    /* FIXME: looks somewhat incomplete                 I think this is just dead code used during

Re: [Mono-dev] CoreCLR patches

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:02 +0100, Mark Probst wrote: Hey Sebastien, Now one thing remains unanswered, could you share your lights on:  static gboolean method_is_safe (MonoMethod *method) { -/* +/* FIXME: looks somewhat

[Mono-dev] Mono 2.4 - Redhat - XCopy Possible?

Hi All, I've been testing CC.NET running on mono 2.4 (release candidate) and everything is going well (more or less :D). Now Novell do not package mono for Redhat anymore so I was wondering what would be the best way forward? Someone on my team has been running the make file to compile Mono

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 2.4 - Redhat - XCopy Possible?

Hi, Now Novell do not package mono for Redhat anymore so I was wondering what would be the best way forward? Mono 2.4 RC1 is available in Fedora rawhide, you could use that Someone on my team has been running the make file to compile Mono but is there a document that lists what is

[Mono-dev] [patch] allowing the verifier to work with coreclr

Hello Rodrigo, Here's a patch to let the verifier work with moonlight (coreclr). I know we talked about a callback for runtime embedders and I still think it's a good idea (for them). OTOH I believe that mono should fully support the coreclr model (when mono_security_enable_core_clr has been

Re: [Mono-dev] [patch] allowing the verifier to work with coreclr

The patch looks fine. Thanks for taking your time on it. 2009/3/17 Sebastien Pouliot sebastien.poul...@gmail.com Hello Rodrigo, Here's a patch to let the verifier work with moonlight (coreclr). I know we talked about a callback for runtime embedders and I still think it's a good idea (for

[Mono-dev] Problem with mono default profiler

Hi All, I am trying to profile a mixed Java/C# application running on Linux (Fedora Core 10) using the Mono default profiler. (I have not had any luck using the Mono Logging profiler or Valgrind.) Please see my system information and stack trace below. My run script looks like the following:

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono's Runtime Architecture

I would be deeply interested in this as well, I am doing a MSc project that will require this :working: matt westerburg wrote: I am curious as to how similar the microsoft Common Language Runtime and Monos runtime are. Is there any website that might document the mono architecture?