Hi Gonzalo,
Works fine now using IE8 as well.
I noticed a few important differences compared to the old status pages:
* there's no additional information for warnings
* all members that throw a NotImplementedException are considered as error
while in some cases this is actually the intended
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
gonzalo.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 20:08 -0600, M. David Peterson wrote:
[...]
While we're on the subject of HttpWebRequest performance, has anyone
looked into what is required to support
Hello, I have a doubt about how Mono manages the memory...
If a user starts Banshee (as a example) and other user (in the same machine)
also starts the Banshee player... Can Mono shares the code sections of the
program to optimize the usage of memory?
--
- Per la llibertat del coneixement -
-
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 14:22 +0200, CaStarCo wrote:
If a user starts Banshee (as a example) and other user (in the same
machine) also starts the Banshee player... Can Mono shares the code
sections of the program to optimize the usage of memory?
It depends on whether the application has been AOT
Hello Gert,
I noticed a few important differences compared to the old status
pages:
The web UI is using the same engine now that gui-compare in mono-tools
is using.
The old status pages had not been maintained for months and stopped
being updated for months before someone noticed.
*
Hello,
There's a failure test-runtime on mono-branch i586 and x86_64 that
started between -r130983:131106. It looks like r131099, r131103 or
possibly r131091 may have caused it.Can both of you take a look at
see if it was one of your commits that has caused the error?
It has been
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
You can post patches in this list, but for us to integrate the code into
Mono, you would have to sign a copyright assignment for the code to
allow Novell to relicense the code as we actively relicense Mono for
people that do not want to use the LGPL.
If
Hi Rodrigo,
Thanks for your reply.
LLVM is been experimented as a AOT only compiler.
The exeuction time for LLVM is huge and not suitable for a JIT VM such as
mono.
So are you suggesting to use libjit in a similar fashion to LLVM or to
replace the regular
mono JIT?
Mono JIT rather for
Thanks, it does look a lot better.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:gonzalo.m...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:31 PM
To: Eyal Alaluf
Cc: Miguel de Icaza; mono-devel-list
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 07:44
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 04:16 -0600, M. David Peterson wrote:
[...]
Implementing this ranges from trivial to us doing our own DNS
query
library (straightforward, I've done it in a past life).
Interesting. What would be the benefit of going the DNS query library
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 12:55 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
[...]
* argument name mismatches are no longer reported (this will become
more
important as C# 4.0 now supports named parameters too)
Yeah, in the future we will add a new option (just like we now have
two modes of comparison)
Hi,
One suggestion has been updating gc-bohem. Is this possible?
This should be already fixed in SVN as of r131472.
Still falling over dead on the PPC...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1290915name=build.log
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß
Hi,
The fix was for the compilation problems with gcc 4.4, not this one.
Zoltan
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
One suggestion has been updating gc-bohem. Is this possible?
This should be already fixed in SVN as of r131472.
13 matches
Mail list logo
