I'm trying to run a very simple SerialPort test app (see the code below) on
Windows using Mono and i get
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an
obj
ect
at (wrapper managed-to-native)
System.IO.Ports.WinSerialStream:ClearCommError
to license it as MIT X11?
Sorry it took so long. MIT X11 is ok to me, I've updated the source
package at http://www.bat.org/~tomba/monoco-20090429.tar.gz to include MIT
X11 license.
Tomi
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hi,
Could you attach that testcase to a bug report and add a verbal description
of what exactly is wrong at http://bugzilla.novell.com . Also mention the
version of windows you're on (which is it?). That's the best way to get the
issue fixed.
Thanks,
Alan.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Rytis
Here is an updated version of my mono debugger patch.
This is much more functional then the previously submitted patch, now
working properly with multi-threaded apps.
Getting the threading to work as expected was a bit difficult, because
the way ptrace works (or doesn't work) on OS X is that
Hi:
In my playing with AIX I decided to make sure mono 2.4 builds on FreeBSD
(where I am more comfortable ;-D) so I went ahead and found only
one issue in building with on HEAD... here it is
with this patch, mono builds flawlessly on FreeBSD Head.. of course
I have not done any testing yet ..
Hello Paolo,
Paolo Molaro-2 wrote:
On 04/24/09 Ian Dichkovsky wrote:
And we have prepared ChangeLogs and added them to
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497320
ChangeLog.diff
ChangeLog_libgc.diff
ChangeLog_mono_arch.diff
ChangeLog_mono_io-layer.diff
ChangeLog_mono_mini.diff
Hello,
I'm getting an OracleException when I'm executing stored procudure what
looks like this:
PROCEDURE Update_Substations (in_subst_id IN NUMBER,
in_state_id IN NUMBER,
in_last_contr IN NUMBER,
Hello Tomi,
Would you be willing to license it as MIT X11?
Sorry it took so long. MIT X11 is ok to me, I've updated the source
package at http://www.bat.org/~tomba/monoco-20090429.tar.gz to
include MIT X11 license.
Thanks for the license update!
I have imported this to Mono's SVN now
Hi,
Whilst attempting to make mono tell me when Com objects are used, after
they have been released - for example:
IComObject i = new CplusplusComObject()
IComObject j = i;
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(i);
j.SomeMethod();
(which incidentally in this situation .Net throws the following
exception:
Hello,
In general, I think the changes look good. They are rather monolithic
- I do wish they'd been submitted to the list in a piecemeal fashion
as they were developed - they'd be a lot easier to digest that way.
I think the odds of some breakage of the o32 port are quite high given
what
Hi. Sorry about this, but I think it's slightly on-topic because it has
to do with Reflection and non-GPLd code.
I've been googling for information about reflection and licenses like
the GPL, that prohibit linking from code with a different license and
found nothing.
Is reflection considered
AFAIK GPL permits deriving of GPL work from non-GPL code. Meaning that you
should not be able to use it in almost any means if you are not GPL. Also
MySQL connector is licensed under GPL but there is a FOSS exception
(http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/) to the license
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:52:03 -0300
Ernesto equista...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been googling for information about reflection and licenses like
the GPL, that prohibit linking from code with a different license
and found nothing.
Is reflection considered linking? Or is it considered a form of
Ernesto wrote:
I'm not trying to circumvent the GPL. Not that I can, either. I just
want my app to be able to dinamically load a standard set of libraries,
and call a generic set of methods. One of this libraries (MySQL
Connector/NET) happens to be GPLd.
As long as your application is
Hello,
The idea of reflection in a system makes difficult to determine where
the fine line is. That said, my _personal_ belief is that using
reflection does not constitute linking. Here is my justification for
that belief:
This is an incorrect believe.
If you are running on the same
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:15:21 -0400
Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com wrote:
Hello,
The idea of reflection in a system makes difficult to determine
where the fine line is. That said, my _personal_ belief is that
using reflection does not constitute linking. Here is my
justification
Hello,
It would appear that by that argument, I can force any proprietary
software to be GPL'd simply by writing a GPL'd module or plugin for it
that it opens with dlopen(). That doesn't seem correct to me; if
that's the case, nobody would provide plugin interfaces. Certainly a
plugin can
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:12:41 -0400
Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com wrote:
Loading GPL code into a proprietary application is not allowed by the
GPL.You can do that in the privacy of your home, but you can not
redistribute this configuration without infringing the license.
I am not sure
Hey guys,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 16:03, Michael B. Trausch m...@zest.trausch.us wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:12:41 -0400
Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com wrote:
Loading GPL code into a proprietary application is not allowed by the
GPL. You can do that in the privacy of your home, but
Hello,
I propose to take this discussion to comp.software.licensing where you
can find endless threads about those issues. Quick search of that
group for just GPL: http://tinyurl.com/d7pdjq .
I was just going to suggest that.
I spent years on gnu.misc.discuss, it might be worth for the newer
20 matches
Mail list logo
