Alex Shulgin wrote:
Hi,
I've filed a somewhat nasty bug a few days back (you may lose your data
if you trigger it): https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575813
I'd really appreciate if someone could take a look at this.
BUMP! Doesn't anyone think it's a critical bug?
--
Alex
I will take a look at it in the next days.
Carlos.
2010/2/5 Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com
Alex Shulgin wrote:
Hi,
I've filed a somewhat nasty bug a few days back (you may lose your data
if you trigger it): https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575813
I'd
Carlos Alberto Cortez wrote:
I will take a look at it in the next days.
OK, thanks for that! :)
--
Alex
2010/2/5 Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com
mailto:alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com
Alex Shulgin wrote:
Hi,
I've filed a somewhat nasty bug a few
Hello,
I need a little update here, please. Is it intended to make Full-AOT
available
to the x86 platform running a Linux OS (maybe in terms of the next 2.6.x
release
discussed here)?
If not, why Full-AOT is not implemented for the x86 platform so far? I ask
here in order to avoid unnecessary
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Martin Däumler m...@cs.tu-chemnitz.dewrote:
Hello,
I need a little update here, please. Is it intended to make Full-AOT
available
to the x86 platform running a Linux OS (maybe in terms of the next 2.6.x
release
discussed here)?
If not, why Full-AOT is not
Hi,
Full-aot support is intended for platforms where JITting is not permitted,
like the iphone.
So ARM is supported, and x86-64 is supported because thats where development
is done.
Zoltan
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Martin Däumler m...@cs.tu-chemnitz.dewrote:
Hello,
I
clarification
Funny, i just read what i wrote. It sounds like I intentionally wrote
a duplicate bug. I didn't, for some reason my searching abilities
improved after I wrote the bug.
My mail is what was intended to bring attention to this issue.
/clarification
Cheers,
Jae
