On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:17 AM, st...@free.fr wrote:
Alright. But my main question was about what I should do specifically about
the commit I mentioned.
Should I restore the line endings to what they were, or leave things as is?
Or does it not matter either way?
Thanks.
I don't know that
I don't mind either way. If someone has a strong opinion on this, let me
know, otherwise I guess I'll just edit the .gitattributes file, to avoid
adding more noise. (And sorry about that crap, really...)
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:17 AM, st...@free.fr wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:13 PM, mike wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Not sure what you mean as I'm not doing a
LoadLibrary().
Yes, you are: it's implicit to P/Invoke. (OK, so .NET is doing it on your
behalf under the covers, but a LoadLibrary() is still occurring.)
Since you're on Windows,
Hi,
I am using monolinker to remove some functionality that I don't want users to
have in my embedded mono application.
My application uses two different C# dlls and users can change/replace one of
them. However, I don't want them to have file read/write access (ex. to write
viruses...). I
Isn't AppDomain's security useable to sandbox the application ?
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hello Friends..
Tomasz Kuszczak admitted Manchester United blew a golden opportunity by only
drawing at Birmingham on Saturday.
With Chelsea's visit to Hull one of seven Premier League games to fall
victim to the atrocious weather at the weekend, United knew victory at St
Andrew's
Hello!
I write for the first time and I hope that I made the right forum. But the
title seemed very general and therefore suitable.
My question:
I'm working for a medium sized software company in France. After the
software has now been translated in German, there is now a matter to bring
them in
I think I messed up. Like, badly.
See this:
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/22c53124ae437b2e7311f3beabd9de22d83b15db
I don't know what this merge is about (I'm its author), but it looks bad to
me.
Here's exactly what I did: I made 5 minor commits locally, double checked
everything to make
On Jan 7, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Guillaume Pouillet wrote:
Isn't AppDomain's security useable to sandbox the application ?
If Mono had a fully implemented Code Access Security (CAS) mechanism? Yes.
Unfortunately, Mono doesn't, so AppDomain sandboxing doesn't work.
The only sandboxing/security
On 07.01.2011 20:51, Stifu wrote:
I think I messed up. Like, badly.
See this:
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/22c53124ae437b2e7311f3beabd9de22d83b15db
I don't know what this merge is about (I'm its author), but it looks bad to
me.
It's probably this situation:
Consider the following test program:
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
public class Foo
{
public static void Main()
{
var t = new TraceSource(Test, SourceLevels.All);
Console.WriteLine(t.Switch.Level.ToString());
}
}
If you run this
Hi,
When pulling new remote changes you can do git pull -rebase which will
avoid the (scary, but completely harmless) merge commit git added for you (I
don't know how to do that with TortoiseGit, but I assume there is a way)
Rolf
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com
Hi Rolf,
You mean I've been feeling like shit all this time for nothing?
... I guess that's good. :)
Thanks a lot, I'll look into it.
- Mail Original -
De: Rolf Bjarne Kvinge rolfli...@ya.com
À: Stifu st...@free.fr, mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Envoyé: Samedi 8 Janvier 2011 01:22:02
13 matches
Mail list logo
