On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com wrote:
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Gelin Yan
A few years ago, I tried to port one of our server from .net
gave up.
Now We are in 2015 and mono has improved quite a bit. I want to know
whether it is ready for backend? I founded many successful cases with mono
but most of them are about mobile development. Could you share some
experience on server side?
Thanks.
Regards
gelin yan
for for these recent crashes? I am interested
in having a look if possible.
Regards
gelin yan
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
, but you may not need all of that depending on your use case
(just embedding runtime for example).
Thanks,
Jonathan
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Gelin Yan dynami...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
the question is as subject. I have searched on google a bit but got
nothing. The building instructions
Hi
the question is as subject. I have searched on google a bit but got
nothing. The building instructions on mono website seems a little bit
outdated. It require cygwin which is not 64 bit version. Other articles
only talk about 32bit. Thanks.
Regards
gelin yan
@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi
I do hope socket threadpool stuff get some improvement (at least reach
the same level as .net runtime).
Regards
gelin yan
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list
on google
however there are no more further info. I doubt maybe just maybe people
here are not interested in using mono with TCP/UDP directly. If they need,
they might consider using platform-specified API to fulfill their purposes.
Regards
gelin yan
___
Mono
@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi Greg
I suggest using sgen. it is now a stable implementation. Boehm has many
problems.
Regards
gelin yan
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:03 AM, pablosantosl...@terra.es
pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote:
Ok: the problem is that I was wrapping the NetworkStream with a
BufferedStream, and BufferedStream is not async in Mono, while it is
async in .NET
:(
On 16/03/2012 16:57, pablosantosl...@terra.es
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Just a heads-up of what we are planning.
We are very close to release the first version of Mono 2.11 [1] which will
be the public preview for Mono 3.0. The major features of Mono 3.0 will
be that we now
Hi all
I am curious the first scenario: embedding c# code and use it as a
scripting language. As regards the size of runtime, it usually bigger than
others like lua or even python, so what is the advantage?
Regards
gelin yan
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Revan revantheda
Hi ykm
Have you used async socket for production purpose? I have tried the new
async socket with mono 2.8 unfortunately, it didn't work well. In other
words, it was unable to perform like .net on windows.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:07 PM, ykm ykmmum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi DJL,
It seems from
Hi Miguel
Thanks for your answer.. I like c# syntax and its power on *nix platform.
We are engaging a large scale real time tracking system. At the past, all
those components were written by c# and ran on windows. We plan to move some
key parts to linux. The mono in particular 2.10.x... make
I am more concerned on when mono 3.0 will be released. As we know, about
performance, mono still has a long way to go. The gc and socket performance
improved significantly but not enough..
regards
gelin yan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Robert Jordan robe...@gmx.net wrote:
On 01.07.2011 12
14 matches
Mail list logo
