ChangeLog entries are included, all unit tests pass.
Please review (or at least comment...)
I have no objections to this if Gert and Robert have blessed this
approach.
I take it you have tested this with ASP.NET and other assorted apps,
right?
___
Hi monkeys,
Could somebody please review my patch for the System.CodeDom classes?
This is the fourth time I'm posting this and nobody provided any
feedback so far. I'm sending this via my gmail account now, in case my
previous mails did not reach the list subscribers (they _did_ reach the
list
:32 AM
Subject: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] CodeGenerator/CodeDom classes
Hi monkeys,
Could somebody please review my patch for the System.CodeDom classes?
This is the fourth time I'm posting this and nobody provided any
feedback so far. I'm sending this via my gmail account now, in case my
Hello,
This is the third time I'm posting this (no counting my first,
Visitor-less version). Nobody provided any feedback so far...
Attached you'll find patches for CodeGenerator.cs and quite a few
System.CodeDom classes. They implement the Visitor pattern for the
CodeGenerator (traverser) and
Hello,
Could somebody please review this patch?
Thanks.
- Juraj
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 22:59 +0100, Juraj Skripsky wrote:
Hello,
Attached you'll find patches for CodeGenerator.cs and quite a few
System.CodeDom classes. Also included is a new file ICodeDomVisitor.cs
which belongs into
Hello,
Attached you'll find patches for CodeGenerator.cs and quite a few
System.CodeDom classes. Also included is a new file ICodeDomVisitor.cs
which belongs into System/System.CodeDom. ChangeLog entries are
included.
These patches replace those (ugly ones) I posted on Jan 6th. They
implement
