Re: [Mono-dev] MS kills Linq to SQL ! --- Linq, Nhibernate or subsonic ?

2008-11-01 Thread Marek Safar
Hello, It had been observed as obvious by not a few people. I am glad to see such a direction by MS team. To my eyes it is not *killed* but will be just discontinued. That's correct interpretation and it's also same as the feedback I gathered. Linq to SQL is now owned and maintained by

[Mono-dev] MS kills Linq to SQL ! --- Linq, Nhibernate or subsonic ?

2008-10-31 Thread Onur Gumus
http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/10/29/update-on-linq-to-sql-and-linq-to-entities-roadmap.aspx On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Onur Gumus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because NHiberate is hard. I mean really hard. If you want something install and go try castle active record On Tue,

Re: [Mono-dev] MS kills Linq to SQL ! --- Linq, Nhibernate or subsonic ?

2008-10-31 Thread Atsushi Eno
It had been observed as obvious by not a few people. I am glad to see such a direction by MS team. To my eyes it is not *killed* but will be just discontinued. I would expect everyone who complains about MS decision to switch to DBLinq and contribute to the project, to be regarded not as *just* a