On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 14:09 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
> Is there a reason why all optimizations aren't on by default? I didn't
> see anything in the mono man page, but I suspect there has to be some
> tradeoff.
There's a time tradeoff -- more optimizations requires more time to JIT
the code, slowing
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 19:28 +0200, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> You need to _run_ it with optimizations enabled:
> mono -O=all,-ssapre Benchmark.exe
> Building with optimizations enabled has basically no effect.
Is there a reason why all optimizations aren't on by default? I didn't
see
On 09/14/05 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Anyway, the result was shocking! The mono runtime was about 67% slower than
> the microsoft runtime. Anybody know why? I was testing this under Windows
It looks like you're easily shocked. After having checked the results,
I'm not shocked, though I'm amu
Hi Paolo,
I wasn't complaining, just merely stating my findings on my computer. I am new
to Mono and .NET
and am currently evaluating Mono for a future development project of ours. I
wanted to know if I
was maybe missing something in my setup of Mono, which could have caused the
slowdown.
HI,
> Anyway, the result was shocking! The mono runtime was about 67% slower than
> the microsoft runtime. Anybody know why?
Without seeing the code, it could be anything.
TTFN
Paul
--
"Logic, my dear Zoe, is merely the ability to be wrong with authority" -
Dr Who
_
Hi,
I came across a article on the net, that compares different languages and
there performance (Java, C#, C++, etc..). I thought I would try something
simular, but testing the execution speed of the .net runtimes for Microsoft
.NET 1.1 and Mono 1.1.8.3
I compiled the C# benchmark application
Attached is the code for the Benchmark.cs application...
Benchmarks.cs
Description: Binary data
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
On 09/14/05 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> If you mean the Benchmark.exe must be built with optimizations on, I have
> done that. It runs a
You need to _run_ it with optimizations enabled:
mono -O=all,-ssapre Benchmark.exe
Building with optimizations enabled has basically no effect.
lupus
If you mean the Benchmark.exe must be built with optimizations on, I have done
that. It runs a
little bit faster, and on some tests, actually slower, but still not nearly as
fast as with the
Microsoft .NET framework.
I installed Mono from the released builds, I don't compile Mono myself. I w
I would suggest build the Mono version with optimizations on and
seeing the performance differences as well. Of course this is not a
total surprise, since Mono is newer than .NET and as such the goal
should be first to get it right and then to speed it up.
On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:18 AM, Grae
10 matches
Mail list logo
