Am 16.09.2008 um 21:42 schrieb Andrew Jorgensen:
What I'm trying to do for solaris is start maintaining the packages on
Blastwave.org. They have a build infrastructure and lots of packagers
to help us with packaging and build difficulties. Go to
http://wiki.blastwave.org/ and click on the
Hi,
So Fedora doesn't do noarch packages?
No, we do have noarch packages. Non-architecture specific things (like
fonts and config scripts) go in them.
What Geoff was getting at is bi-arch installations. In Debian and in
openSUSE we can install both architectures at once. Packages that
Hi,
I will try to take up this particular part of the discussion over in
Fedora land. Something needs to be done better here but we need
buy-in from Fedora or we will just piss them off. This list is not
the place for a dispute with Fedora.
I totally agree, however this really isn't a
Hi,
For Fedora/RedHat users, the rule for 64 bit users is that code goes
in /usr/lib64 rather than /usr/lib. Mono has quite a few packages which
proports to move code to the correct libdir, but has things hardcoded as
$(prefix)/lib rather than $(libdir) within config (and even source)
Hi,
So what happens if I install 32-bit and 64-bit mono on a 64-bit box, I
get 2 of every .dll?
No. When you update via yum, the correct package is installed for your
architecture. If you then decide to use a non-Fedora RPM, then that's
when things go potty and you get 2 of every
Hi,
There is a good reason. A very good reason. It makes the MD
development independent of the mono development.
Also, this particular complaint is rather out of date. MD has built
Cecil from bundled sources since *last October* (I replaced most of
our bundled binaries to make things
Hi there,
I think we can commit to keep builds for
- Solaris x86
- Solaris SPARC
- Mac PPC
(And hopefully soon HP-UX, but not yet).
But, we'd need some help starting up since I expect some problems
building in Solaris.
pablo
www.plasticscm.com
Andrew Jorgensen escribió:
The Mono Team
We'll build for Mac OS X on PPC and x86 still but we would appreciate
help with Solaris.
What I'm trying to do for solaris is start maintaining the packages on
Blastwave.org. They have a build infrastructure and lots of packagers
to help us with packaging and build difficulties. Go to
Ok, signed up at blastwave.
Andrew Jorgensen escribió:
We'll build for Mac OS X on PPC and x86 still but we would appreciate
help with Solaris.
What I'm trying to do for solaris is start maintaining the packages on
Blastwave.org. They have a build infrastructure and lots of packagers
to
A new mailing list has been created for mono packagers:
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-packagers-list
Hopefully we can use this to coordinate our efforts better and discuss issues
we face as packagers. If you maintain (or will soon maintain) a downstream
package of mono please
10 matches
Mail list logo
