On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:15 +, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Alas, = 1.5 is insufficient, as OpenOffice.org has seen -- file
movements have been *lost* during merges. See [0] and [1]. [2]
mentions:
The version we're running is 1.5.5 compiled from source.
-Gonzalo
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 20:14 +, Alan McGovern wrote:
Hey,
SVN commits have been taking well over 60 seconds to complete all day.
Is this just a temporary thing or is there an issue with the upgrade?
The CIA bot in the post-commit hook was taking its time because the
server it connects to
Hi Gonzalo,
Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
The Mono SVN server at mono-cvs.ximian.com has been upgraded to
Subversion 1.5.x.
That means that if you have a 1.5.x client you will finally be able to
enjoy merge tracking, sparse checkouts, changelists...
See
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:36 +0100, Robert Jordan wrote:
Since older clients are not updating svn:mergeinfo, merge tracking
could be easily broken if an old client is allowed to commit to
/branches.
You may want to block those clients with a start-commit hook:
Thanks!
-Gonzalo
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:36 +0100, Robert Jordan wrote:
Since older clients are not updating svn:mergeinfo, merge tracking
could be easily broken if an old client is allowed to commit to
/branches.
You may want to block those clients with a start-commit hook:
---8---
#!/bin/bash
Hey,
SVN commits have been taking well over 60 seconds to complete all day. Is
this just a temporary thing or is there an issue with the upgrade?
Thanks,
Alan.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jonathan Pryor jonpr...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:36 +0100, Robert Jordan wrote:
The Mono SVN server at mono-cvs.ximian.com has been upgraded to
Subversion 1.5.x.
That means that if you have a 1.5.x client you will finally be able to
enjoy merge tracking, sparse checkouts, changelists...
See http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.5_releasenotes.html for the
complete list of new
