Spam detection software, running on the system polystimulus.com, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that
Spam detection software, running on the system polystimulus.com, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for
Spam detection software, running on the system polystimulus.com, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for
Hello,
Here is a solution I like most.
mcs.patch
Description: Binary data
mono.diff
Description: Binary data
Comments?
Jb
On May 8, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
Hey,
I was just having a look at that :)
On May 8, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
The above test prints out
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 17:54 -0500, Voigt, Benjamin wrote:
Would someone please be so kind as to run the following unit test on
Mono?
A similar test would likely be this:
using System;
using System.Reflection;
class GetInterfaceMap
{
public
Hey,
I was just having a look at that :)
On May 8, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
The above test prints out _nothing_. This is because System.Byte[]
doesn't implement any interfaces, rather it's System.Byte[]'s _base_
type which implements all the interfaces, and Mono's
Would someone please be so kind as to run the following unit test on Mono?
It's written against Zanebug but should be easy to run with any testing
framework.
using Adapdev.UnitTest;
[TestFixture]
class GetInterfaceMap
{
[Test]
public static void ByteArray()
{
System.Type
