Hi Gary,
Thank you very much for this. I will take a look. Are you actively carrying
on developing it?
Thanks
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/workflow-foundation-4-tp1539102p4657480.html
Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Chris
I plan to work on at it though unsure at this stage how much time im going
to have with starting a new job.
Regards
Gary
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Chris Camplejohn ch...@camplejohn.co.ukwrote:
Hi Gary,
Thank you very much for this. I will take a look. Are you actively
Hello
I've been working on the beginnings of WF4 support for a few weeks. I
hadn't any previous experience with it so it has been slow enough progress.
While I have a prototype of activity scheduling working
(see WorkflowInvoker.cs), I hoped to add further support for the data model
along with
Hi Jon,
Yes you are correct. I had set it to copy the System.Activities locally and
it had copied the reference assembly. Once I used the one from the .NET
Framework assembly it solved this problem.
Thanks
Chris
--
View this message in context:
Hi Miguel,
What would be required to begin to look into getting this going?
The bit I am missing is that given that System.Activities is completely
managed code with no p-invokes, why does this assembly not work when run
under Mono? What is the restriction that prevents it working?
I think I
You cannot use MS's assemblies on mono as it's a violation of their EULA.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Chris Camplejohn ch...@camplejohn.co.ukwrote:
Hi Miguel,
What would be required to begin to look into getting this going?
The bit I am missing is that given that System.Activities is
Rodrigo,
Can you please sent me the link to this section of the EULA?
Regards,
Ben Clewett.
On 2012-11-16 15:28, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
You cannot use MS's assemblies on mono as it's a violation of their EULA.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Chris Camplejohn
ch...@camplejohn.co.uk
Yes I understand that this is the case for some of their assemblies, but I am
interested from a technical perspective what is the limitation? I would like
to get it running with their assemblies before considering if we begin to
rewrite them for Mono.
But for example when I try to run a test
It's a standard clause that MS uses on all of it's software release. You
cannot use its software on non windows OS unless it's stated otherwise.
It has been the case of most of its software, so one can safely assume the
same applies here.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Ben Clewett
Please file a bug.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Chris Camplejohn
ch...@camplejohn.co.ukwrote:
Yes I understand that this is the case for some of their assemblies, but I
am
interested from a technical perspective what is the limitation? I would
like
to get it running with their
Just a guess here, but I think maybe you took the Microsoft
System.Activities.dll assembly out of:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\
These assemblies have been stripped of all code and are simply empty
methods and classes to compile against.
You will want to get the full
Hi,
I'm ceo of Natan, software development company in France. We are
interesting in contributing.
What is the first step we need to take to get started ?
Thanks a lot
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hi,
I'm ceo of Natan, software development company in France. We are
interesting in contributing.
What is the first step we need to take to get started ?
This is good starting point.
http://www.mono-project.com/Contributing
I don't think anyone is working on WWF4, so you are free to
Cool :) I left my stubs for WF4 in our old olive module which used to
be for new API. It could be reused if you want.
https://github.com/mono/olive/tree/master/class/System.Activities
Atsushi Eno
Charles Benassaya wrote:
Hi,
I'm ceo of Natan, software development company in France. We are
No plans to implement Workflow Foundation 4?
Thanks
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
What is the status of the WF project? It is that in Mono Olive of 11 months
ago or there is newer code?
This would have to be new code.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hello folks,
This week at the PDC we learned an important bit: that the Worfklow
Foundation 4 is a simplified, much smaller and much simpler version of
Workflow Foundation.
When talking to the WF team, they seemed to think that we could
reimplement the new version relatively quickly.
17 matches
Mail list logo
