> I don't understand why you stick to the conclusion that those
> case insensitive languages can, or must be able to, access to
> non-CLSCompliant types without problem, without "discussion if
> casesensitivity makes sense or not".
I see casesensitivity as some kind of personal preferences. Use it
Its not really a Pascal compiler bug btw. (besides that the "error"
should be labled a "warning", which is currently under discussion)
Oh, OK there's "NOTE" lines in the first post.
I did not try to find out what CLS compliancy requirements are not met
in detail, but there is one which cause
Atsushi Eno wrote:
>
> The same argument about pascal compiler bug was there.
> http://galactus.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2005-June/012409.html
Sorry, I was not yet subscribed to this list when that was discussed.
However, this is not really about XML.MiniParser - its just an example,
Hi,
The same argument about pascal compiler bug was there.
http://galactus.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2005-June/012409.html
I did not try to find out what CLS compliancy requirements are not met
in detail, but there is one which causes this class to be less usable
with some .NET langu
while porting a library of ours to be usable under mono, we just come
accross an issue which has some impacts on non-C# .NET languages.
in Mono.Security there is a MiniParser class which is declared to be
non-CLS compliant:
http://svn.myrealbox.com/viewcvs/trunk/mcs/class/Mono.Security/Mono.Xm