On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 22:48 -0400, Jonathan S. Chambers wrote:
> Thanks for the answers. I'm just experimenting with methods to call
> managed code from unmanaged code without using COM interop, i.e.
> something that would work on both .Net and Mono. Any advice would be
> appreciated.
Basic quest
From: Jonathan S. Chambers
Thanks for the answers. I'm just experimenting with methods to call
managed code from unmanaged code without using COM interop, i.e. something
that would work on both .Net and Mono. Any advice would be appreciated.
As the function is exported by the DLL as usual and th
ified
to load lazily, so the load really didn't ever happen.
Thanks Again,
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Pryor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/29/2005 10:29 PM
To: Jonathan S. Chambers
Cc: Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-
Hello,
> It seems that the Mono ilasm is ignoring the .export directive. Is this
> intentional?
That might just be a limitation of the current ilasm, not a design
decision.
Miguel
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http:/
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:26 -0400, Jonathan S. Chambers wrote:
> Hello All,
> I know that mixed mode assemblies are not supported under Mono
> (at least in the managed/unmanaged C++ sense). There is an older article
> (I've listed the link below) that demonstrates how to call managed
> functi
It seems that the Mono ilasm is ignoring the .export directive. Is this
intentional?
Thanks Again,
Jonthan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
S. Chambers
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:27 AM
To: Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Su
