Re: spam: suspected: Re: [Mono-devel-list] patch for nunit support for xmlconf

2005-06-26 Thread Atsushi Eno
Andrew Skiba wrote: Atsushi Eno wrote: If you didn't need any comments, then you could just commit things. But since you didn't do that, then what you asked is all readers' comments. I'm just a reader here, without mentioning any kind of "permission" and I think your way of answering is weird.

Re: spam: suspected: Re: [Mono-devel-list] patch for nunit support for xmlconf

2005-06-26 Thread Andrew Skiba
Atsushi Eno wrote: If you didn't need any comments, then you could just commit things. But since you didn't do that, then what you asked is all readers' comments. I'm just a reader here, without mentioning any kind of "permission" and I think your way of answering is weird. No? Of course, I wa

Re: spam: suspected: Re: [Mono-devel-list] patch for nunit support for xmlconf

2005-06-26 Thread Atsushi Eno
Andrew Skiba wrote: Atsushi Eno wrote: > (Also note that you are saying "I gave you full Sunday for patch > review" which is kinda zero day attack :-S) Can't stop laughing. "Zero day attack" sounds good. What if I posted changes on your works on Thursday evening for you, while I know you guy

Re: spam: suspected: Re: [Mono-devel-list] patch for nunit support for xmlconf

2005-06-26 Thread Andrew Skiba
Atsushi Eno wrote: > (Also note that you are saying "I gave you full Sunday for patch > review" which is kinda zero day attack :-S) Can't stop laughing. "Zero day attack" sounds good. I thought, I have your permission to commit to the W3C directory without review. And then, I did not say I will