Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread MarLOne
Hello Timotheus, Thanks and will try. Perhaps you can give me some assistance with MonoDevelop/Mono. In MS .Net, I can stay in say XP (even it has reached end of life) and still can run VS2010 with .Net 4. But in Mint, I seem to be stuck in the version of Mono I can get, hence that old version

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Timotheus Pokorra
Hello MarL, Don't worry, no need to install a new OS... Please have a look on the download page: http://www.mono-project.com/download/#download-lin see the link http://www.mono-project.com/docs/getting-started/install/linux/#debian-ubuntu-and-derivatives I think that even provides a recent

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread MarLOne
Hello Timotheus, I have the answer for you. I have a VM with Mint17 which has Mono runtime 3.2.8 which is one major version that I reported earlier. So I build a console application to test using this schema (embedded resource) with this sample instance document. This also gives me a good test

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Rafael Teixeira
Probably is the core System.Xml class library assembly that misses some functionality. It is kind of lower priority these days as most people is moving to schema-less serialization with either Xml or JSON. Surely nobody needed to exercise the extension mechanism before, so that's is why it is

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Alexander Köplinger
For completeness sake I tested it on Mono 3.10 and latest master, it throws the same error there too, so it's definitely a bug in Mono :) -- Alex Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:49:34 -0200 From: mono...@gmail.com To: infoseeker...@gmail.com CC: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re:

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hello, If you believe xs:complexType/xs:extension is that superficial, could you explain why the validation result is wrong? Dealing with xs:complexType is one of the most complicated XML schema validation technology, which involved handful of ambiguity, which may be fixed in later

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Atsushi Eno
Actually I was wrong, it's already there: https://github.com/Microsoft/referencesource/tree/master/System.Xml/System/Xml/Schema Atsushi Eno On 2014年11月13日 00:05, Atsushi Eno wrote: And Microsoft has announced open-sourcing .NET! So you don't have to spread your hate speech on bugs, we will

[Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Thwaites
Hi All, I have no words... http://www.hanselman.com/blog/AnnouncingNET2015NETAsOpenSourceNETOnMacAndLinuxAndVisualStudioCommunity.aspx Martin ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono .Net difference - handling xs:extension please help

2014-11-12 Thread Atsushi Eno
And Microsoft has announced open-sourcing .NET! So you don't have to spread your hate speech on bugs, we will take their good code. https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/tree/master/src (No XML Schema implementation yet, but I assume that would happen at some stage.) Atsushi Eno On 2014年11月12日

Re: [Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Gergely Buday
It is not available at the moment. Could you summarise? On 12 November 2014 17:10, Martin Thwaites monofo...@my2cents.co.uk wrote: Hi All, I have no words... http://www.hanselman.com/blog/AnnouncingNET2015NETAsOpenSourceNETOnMacAndLinuxAndVisualStudioCommunity.aspx Martin

Re: [Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Thwaites
summary .NET is to be fully opensourced by Microsoft under the MIT Licence. /summary On 12 November 2014 16:20, Gergely Buday gbu...@gmail.com wrote: It is not available at the moment. Could you summarise? On 12 November 2014 17:10, Martin Thwaites monofo...@my2cents.co.uk wrote: Hi All,

Re: [Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Andrea Francesco Iuorio
http://news.microsoft.com/2014/11/12/microsoft-takes-net-open-source-and-cross-platform-adds-new-development-capabilities-with-visual-studio-2015-net-2015-and-visual-studio-online/ On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Martin Thwaites monofo...@my2cents.co.uk wrote: summary .NET is to be fully

[Mono-dev] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hey guys, I posted details about the open sourcing of .NET and Mono on my blog. We have already started the work to integrate the .NET Framework code, and once I get back to Boston after the event we will check in the results. That is the reason we did not want to take the large #ifdef patch

Re: [Mono-dev] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Johnnie Odom
It seems to me that the work integrating the .NET code, the #ifdef removal, and deprecating the older profiles would nicely combine to justify bumping the Mono version number, as posited previously. Congratulations, and enjoy your celebration. The work you have all been doing will be

Re: [Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Ian Norton
Rather cool! On 12 November 2014 16:24, Andrea Francesco Iuorio andreafrancesco.iuo...@gmail.com wrote: http://news.microsoft.com/2014/11/12/microsoft-takes-net-open-source-and-cross-platform-adds-new-development-capabilities-with-visual-studio-2015-net-2015-and-visual-studio-online/ On

Re: [Mono-dev] .NET Announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Torello Querci
Cool 2014-11-12 19:00 GMT+01:00 Ian Norton inor...@gmail.com: Rather cool! On 12 November 2014 16:24, Andrea Francesco Iuorio andreafrancesco.iuo...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Mono-dev] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread David Nelson
Fantastic news! No doubt the leaders of the Mono project over the last decade-plus have had a huge impact on making this happen, both directly and indirectly. Thank you (all) for all you have done to get us to this point. On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Johnnie Odom jo...@escambia.k12.fl.us

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list- boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Hey guys, I posted details about the open sourcing of .NET and Mono on my blog. We have already started the work to integrate the .NET Framework code, and once I get back

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Daniel Espinosa
Xamarin Studio for Linux is comming soon!!! El mié, 12 de nov 2014 a las 2:38 , Martin Thwaites monofo...@my2cents.co.uk escribió: Next stop... Visual Studio on Linux :D On 12 November 2014 19:45, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) edward.harvey.m...@clevertrove.com wrote: From:

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Stephen Shaw
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com wrote: Xamarin Studio for Linux is comming soon!!! Technically Xamarin Studio is already on Linux under monodevelop :) Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Thwaites
I want Visual Studio, full, with all bells and whistles. As good as Xamarin Studio/MonoDevelop is, I'd much prefer full VS. I imagine that is likely to not be a reality for a long time. Having said that, I said the same about opensourcing the .NET framework, and just look how wrong I was on

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Hi On 20141112 21:43 , Martin Thwaites wrote: I want Visual Studio, full, with all bells and whistles. As good as Xamarin Studio/MonoDevelop is, I'd much prefer full VS. Hardly imaginable. .net in the beginning was one big COM object - even had a name what com+ v.2? Similar with VS - still

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
On 20141112 21:40 , Daniel Espinosa wrote: Xamarin Studio for Linux is comming soon!!! Remeber MonoDevelop? MonoDevelop is not dead it is the core of XS, so it is there. If you mean on Xamarin.Android support that is another story. Xamarin.iOS will be NO-GO because of Apple's requirement

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Thwaites
. That said, Xamarin has publicly said that there aren't plans for it at the moment (can't remember where, probably on this list, or their forum). Martin On 12 November 2014 20:43, Miljenko Cvjetko mcvje...@holisticware.net wrote: On 20141112 21:40 , Daniel Espinosa wrote: Xamarin Studio

Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.

2014-11-12 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Hi Martin On 20141112 21:57 , Martin Thwaites wrote: Miljkenko, Mel - to make it easier. I'm not sure you understand how Xamarin studio works. I think I know, but OK. It works on Windows, True. even for iPhone development, You have mixed it with Visual Studio plugin for iOS development