> From: "Vasudevan Sudharsan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Subject: [Mono-devel-list] Error in Mbas
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:50:58 -0700
> Hai
>
> When I tried to build in Mbas I got the following errors [ in mcs/mbas
> ]
>
> driver.cs(70) error CS0117: Attribute `Mono.GetOptions.OptionA
Err... attached are the same tests in diff form (.patch)
-Ankit
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:46:46 +0530, Ankit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is DictionaryTest.cs with the test cases.
>
> -Ankit
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:34:09 +0530, Ankit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yup.. we
Attached is DictionaryTest.cs with the test cases.
-Ankit
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:34:09 +0530, Ankit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup.. we have the test cases also. Giving a little problem while
> running the test, will fix that and send it tomorrow.
>
> -Ankit
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:5
Hai
When I tried to build in Mbas I got the following errors [ in "mcs/mbas" ]
driver.cs(70) error CS0117: Attribute `Mono.GetOptions.OptionAttribute' does not contain a definition for `SecondLevelHelp'
driver.cs(91) err
Hi,
I added a file DictionaryTest.cs to
mcs/class/corlib/Test/System.Collections.Generic, added an entry to
corlib_test.dll.sources.
Running
$ make test PROFILE=net_2_0
runs fine
$ make run-test PROFILE=net_2_0
OS Version: Unix 2.4.21.99Mono Version: 2.0.40607.16
Excluded categories: NotWo
Yes, you're absolutely right. Oh well, I tried. :-)
Jesse Towner, Lead Programmer, Hybrid Mobile Technologies, LLC
Email Addresses: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Public Key: http://www.virtuallyonline.net/perso
I was having some horrible trouble compiling Mono from SVN as well as the
latest source release until today when I tried one last SVN time before
giving up for quite some time and trying to come up with a bug-report
and it worked!
Btw I think it might have been my NPTL + AMD64 + Gentoo
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:57 -0500, Ben Maurer wrote:
> In the end, supporting people's completely broken code doesn't seem to
> be worthy of adding complexity to io-layer, especially given that we
> have a plethora of bugs to track down there already.
>
> However, it is Dick's call, not mine.
If
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 13:26 -0800, Jesse Towner wrote:
> Even so, some
> people insist on using it. Just do a google search for "C# TickCount
> system uptime" to see
> what I mean (note this returns both correct and incorrect examples).
>
> The correct way to determine the system uptime with the M
Landed on SVN HEAD, some small new features for Mono.GetOptions (that
mbas is already using).
Changed Mono.GetOptions/OptionAttribute.cs,
Mono.GetOptions/OptionDetails.cs, Mono.GetOptions/OptionList
*1* Implemented support for vbc style booleans: /debug+ /debug- .
* Usage:
[Option
Ben Maurer wrote:
Yes, sure. I can do that. However, I'm a little unsure if I should
bother with all of these changes if they're not going to be committed
anyway. I know of at least a few people who have mistakenly used
System.Environment.TickCount and complained it didn't work the
way they expecte
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 21:02 +0100, Willibald Krenn wrote:
> >
> > For some meanings of `very high costs'. The cost is likely orders of
> > magnitude less than the actual recompilation.
>
> Ahm, yes - of course. But I meant in comparison to 'normal' instance
> methods..
> Any answer to the 'real'
For some meanings of `very high costs'. The cost is likely orders of
magnitude less than the actual recompilation.
Ahm, yes - of course. But I meant in comparison to 'normal' instance
methods..
Any answer to the 'real' question?
Thanks,
Willi
___
Mono-
> Yes, sure. I can do that. However, I'm a little unsure if I should
> bother with all of these changes if they're not going to be committed
> anyway. I know of at least a few people who have mistakenly used
> System.Environment.TickCount and complained it didn't work the
> way they expected it to
Just to confirm that I am using Fedora Core 2 and also Win XP.
Cheers
Simon
> This is varied: many developers use different distros in different
> versions.
>
> Just an example: I'm still using Fedora Core 2.
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:40:40 +1300, Scott Mohekey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Last time I checked its have a target build specific for mono. It
moved to Apache Foundation Incubator:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/
and they answer your question at:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/framework-support.html
HIH,
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:33:40 +0100 (CET), Mauro Be
Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 02/26/05 Jesse Towner wrote:
Could you add configure tests for this, instead of using operating system
defines?
Yes, that can be done.
Do you have access to such systems? If the code is not tested
it's better to not include it.
I'll remove code for the systems I can't test.
> Hi!
>
> I just looked at the VTable and hope someone can confirm my 'findings':
>
> Each virtual method that is part of an interface has (at least?) two
> entries in the VMT: One in the 'class' area, a second one in the
> 'interface' area. Even more pointers to the same method are possible in
> t
This is varied: many developers use different distros in different versions.
Just an example: I'm still using Fedora Core 2.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:40:40 +1300, Scott Mohekey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I'm interested in elliminating any possible issues caused by
> incompatabilities of
Sorry I now checked: FEFF is the ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE that is
also used as Byte Order Marker, what normally entails it to be
eliminated if it is the first unicode character in a text stream, but
it sure should be preserved by the encoder/decoder.
About the character: http://www.fileformat.inf
You are using outdated documentation for the utf-8 standard as of
unicode 3.x, we have more than 1 million codepoints (20 bits) and
utf-8 was extended to expand some of those in 5 or 6 bytes.
Get some updated documentation.
Also from the top of my mind \uFEFF is the continuation prefix in
utf-16
inline
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:54:58 -0700, Ritvik Mayank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a few test are hanging under mbas :
> under Test/errors and Test/tests and Test/rerrors
> (i have substituted vbc.exe with mbas using a symbolic links.)
>From SVN HEAD I'm getting an Exception in the co
Hi!
I just looked at the VTable and hope someone can confirm my 'findings':
Each virtual method that is part of an interface has (at least?) two
entries in the VMT: One in the 'class' area, a second one in the
'interface' area. Even more pointers to the same method are possible in
the interface
Hi, log4net is available/ported on Mono?
Thx
___
Nuovo Yahoo! Messenger: E' molto più divertente: Audibles, Avatar, Webcam,
Giochi, Rubrica
Scaricalo ora!
http://it.messenger.yahoo.it
___
Mono-devel-l
It's ok, I've figured out how to do it and it is
now working fine. However, the timeout property for the
HttpWebRequest object doesn't seem affect the timeout period.
I'm setting it to timeout after 500 (ms) but it's
taking about 4-5mins until it actually does. Any
ideas?
Thanks a lot
Ok, I understand. But SWF will implemented as Windows
or Mono's team will correct this problems or are in
the SWF base-structure? I think is faster develop in
SWF and I believe that the time will implement SWF
Forms very similar to Windows OS... and more portable...
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in
Yup.. we have the test cases also. Giving a little problem while
running the test, will fix that and send it tomorrow.
-Ankit
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:58:06 -0500 (EST), Ben Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Attached is an implementation of Generic Dictionary coded by Suresh and
> > I.
>
> Mu
Hi
all,
We're experimenting with mono for a small app that uses a GET to pull
down page contents. I have tested the code over http, and https using .NET
and it works fine. However, when using mono the http test works fine but
the https fails. I'm getting the following exception thrown
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 19:27 +0530, Ankit Jain wrote:
> Attached patch adds conversion of SocketFlags to linux flags required
> for _wapi_recv, _wapi_recvfrom, _wapi_send, _wapi_sendto calls.
The patch adds non-W32 API to io-layer, which breaks the windows build.
You should turn managed flags into
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:01 +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> GetTickCount () is defined as returning the (possibly wrapped) number of
> ms since the boot. Of course anyone who uses it to get the uptime is
> stupid, but that doesn't mean we should not have a correct implementation
> when possible. It's
On 02/28/05 Dick Porter wrote:
> However, using GetTickCount to look up the boot time is completely
> pointless on reliable OSes, because as Ben says the 32bit counter wraps
> round every 47 days. Therefore I won't be applying a patch to "fix"
> this non-issue.
GetTickCount () is defined as retur
> More specifically, it will look like
> Windows, which might as well be ass on Gnome/KDE. :-)
Worse, it'll look like Windows 95, which looked like ass even on Windows
95... XP isn't exactly a Mac, but when an app does its themeing correctly,
it's a hell of a lot better than the 95 look.
> Wh
Hi,
Err.. forgot to attach the patch...
Attached patch adds conversion of SocketFlags to linux flags required
for _wapi_recv, _wapi_recvfrom, _wapi_send, _wapi_sendto calls.
I'm not sure how to handle these flags though:
DontRoute
MaxIOVectorLength
Partial
Also, the patch adds handling of Soc
>From inside the mono runtime, the proper way to walk the stack
>frames in a thread is to use the mono_walk_stack() function, there
>are a couple of examples of its use in mini/mini-exceptions.c.
For a HelloWorld application,
I make a call to mono_jit_walk_stack from an unhandled exception filter
Hi,
Attached patch adds conversion of SocketFlags to linux flags required
for _wapi_recv, _wapi_recvfrom, _wapi_send, _wapi_sendto calls.
I'm not sure how to handle these flags though:
DontRoute
MaxIOVectorLength
Partial
Also, the patch adds handling of SocketOption.Error for getsockopt
which i
On dl, 2005-02-28 at 14:19 +0100, Aleksandar Dezelin wrote:
> I have an object serialized in .NET and I wan't to deserialize it in
> Mono but I throws an exception saying that "binary object cannot be
> found". I've tried to "chop" BinaryFormatter from latest svn code but
> it won't work properly u
I have an object serialized in .NET and I wan't to deserialize it in
Mono but I throws an exception saying that "binary object cannot be
found". I've tried to "chop" BinaryFormatter from latest svn code but
it won't work properly under .NET. Does anybody have an idea how can I
transform this serial
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 19:48 -0500, Ben Maurer wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:07 -0800, Jesse Towner wrote:
> > This should fix the problem of System.Environment.TickCount reporting
> > incorrect values on
> > non-windows systems. It now determines the boot time of the system, and
> > from there
> Attached is an implementation of Generic Dictionary coded by Suresh and
> I.
Much, much, much better. Is this api compat with the latest msft version?
Miguel, do you have any pending changes from ECMA?
Also, do you have unit tests?
-- Ben
___
Mono-
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 09:57 +0100, Mauro Bertoli wrote:
> Hi, thank for answers. I don't understand why I should
> use GTK# or similares... the windows forms Mono layer
> is not native? it require some extra-libraries /
> layers? It think not, I'm wrong? I will integrate
> Forms on Linux after... I
Attached is an implementation of Generic Dictionary coded by Suresh and I.
Regards,
Ankit
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:56:51 -0500 (EST), Ben Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ben Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Matthijs ter Woord (meddochat)" <[EMA
On 02/28/05 Jeffrey Knight wrote:
> MONO_PATH="../../class/lib/default:$MONO_PATH"
> /root/mono-1.1.4/runtime/mono-wrapper ../../class/lib/default/mcs.exe
> -d:NET_1_1 -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig /r:mscorlib.dll /r:System.dll
> /r:System.Windows.Forms.dll @Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll.resources
> -
On 02/25/05 Carlos Alberto Cortez wrote:
> Attached are some checks added to the nunit tests for System.Reflection
> classes that could throw an exception, when the assembly they belong to
> is a reflection only one.
>
> Could I commit?
Commit after you have tested the tests work on the MS runtim
On 02/25/05 Okehee Goh wrote:
> I'm using mono1.1.4 with JIT in Linux on X86.
> I'd like to check native codes generated for C# applications with JIT.
> I want to see how C# methods and Mono Internal calls are translated
> into native codes, and also how stack frames for them are different?
> Ult
On 02/26/05 Jesse Towner wrote:
> This should fix the problem of System.Environment.TickCount reporting
> incorrect values on
> non-windows systems. It now determines the boot time of the system, and
> from there can
> determine the uptime, which is what GetTickCount requires. I haven't
> tested it
On 02/28/05 Scott Mohekey wrote:
> All of the malloc_consolidate issues have gone, however the
> mono_jit_free_method assertion failure (method->dynamic) still occurs on
> occasion.
Could you file a bug report with a test case that reproduces this?
Thanks.
lupus
--
---
Hi, thank for answers. I don't understand why I should
use GTK# or similares... the windows forms Mono layer
is not native? it require some extra-libraries /
layers? It think not, I'm wrong? I will integrate
Forms on Linux after... I will it another 4/6 months
or year! What do you think?
Mauro
> -
--- Zac Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Everything should be perfect. For better integration
> of GTK# elements
> into a Windows environment use the WIMP theme. It
> emulates Windows text
> regions and exposes accessibility features of
> Windows on GTK widgets.
> Avoid using GConf, Gnom
48 matches
Mail list logo
