Can you please make the download of Mono for Windows setup exe via http instead
of ftp please?
FTP is restricted where I work.
ftp://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/archive/2.2/windows-installer/5/mono-2.2-gtksharp-2.12.7-win32-5.exe
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Thomas Wiest twi...@novell.com wrote:
From:
Just change the ftp:// to http:// and it should work:
http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/archive/2.2/windows-installer/5/mono-2.2-gtksharp-2.12.7-win32-5.exe
Jonathan
Daniel Morgan wrote:
Can you please make the download of Mono for Windows setup exe via http
instead of ftp please?
FTP is
Hey guys,
Just wanted to let you know a behavioral difference between .Net and
Mono and potentially get advice from you. The method
SA.CreateEncryptor.TransformFinalBlock() differs on the two platforms.
Specifically, Mono appears to continue from where the last one ended,
whereas .Net
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:27 -0500, David Wolinsky wrote:
Hey guys,
Just wanted to let you know a behavioral difference between .Net and
Mono and potentially get advice from you. The method
SA.CreateEncryptor.TransformFinalBlock() differs on the two platforms.
Specifically, Mono appears
Hi,
Attached for review is a patch that allows multiple calls to
mono_jit_init.
I appreciate that the first response to this request may be, 'why would
you want to do that?' Given that, I will attempt to give a
justification.
The reason I need to be able to do this is because:
I have an
Still, why can't your code do the mono_get_root_domain () check?
The Moonlight folks requested this as well and it turned out that what they
needed was support for creating AppDomains from the unmanaged API. This
has been included and will be part of the the upcoming 2.4 release.
2009/1/30 Tom
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:51 -0200, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
Still, why can't your code do the mono_get_root_domain () check?
yes, good point thanks! (I think I must have assumed it wasn't exposed)
The Moonlight folks requested this as well and it turned out that what
they
needed was support
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 13:59 -0500, David Wolinsky wrote:
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:27 -0500, David Wolinsky wrote:
Hey guys,
Just wanted to let you know a behavioral difference between .Net and
Mono and potentially get
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
Thanks for the wealth of information and making it clear. I agree this
is not the issue, obviously we cannot use the TransformFinalBlock
without a) creating decryptors and encryptors each time or b) force
users to use a frozen mono version. So back to the
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 15:38 -0300, Carlos Ruiz Diaz wrote:
Hello list.
Can mono run under an IBM AS-400 or any variant of this OS?
If the AS400 is LPAR capable you can mono on Linux in the LPAR.
After that its gets complicated.
___
Thank you for your reply.
So it means that I have to install Linux into another partition inside the
AS400?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Steven Munroe
munro...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 15:38 -0300, Carlos Ruiz Diaz wrote:
Hello list.
Can mono run under an IBM
- Original Message -
From: Steven Munroe munro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Carlos Ruiz Diaz carlos.ruizd...@gmail.com
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono and IBM
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 15:38 -0300, Carlos Ruiz Diaz
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:18 -0400, Carlos Ruiz Diaz wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
So it means that I have to install Linux into another partition inside
the AS400?
Yes, to my knowledge no one is working on a native port to AS400 (AKA
i5OS).
There might be a mono port for AIX, which
I think there is no solution for this particular problem, at least for now.
I have to decide which language and architecture to use in a major project
that I have to start soom. My very first idea was C/C++ but I don't have
much time to think about typical problems that this language and its
- Original Message -
From: Carlos Ruiz Diaz
To: munro...@us.ibm.com
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono and IBM
I think there is no solution for this particular problem, at least for now.
I have
2009/1/31 Carlos Ruiz Diaz carlos.ruizd...@gmail.com
Do you think that is reliable and secure to build a high availability
system that manage money in real time using mono and C#?
Mono was not designed for real-time workloads. There is a project that adds
support for locking with priority
16 matches
Mail list logo
