[Mono-dev] [Patch] Support for exponents in Int32.Parse

2009-12-21 Thread Carlos Alberto Cortez
Hey! I was going to commit the attached patch, in order to support exponent notation in our Int32.Parse method (as declared in NumberStyles.AllowExponent). But then I thought it would be a good idea to throw the patch to the public, in case somebody is interested - specially in the overflow

[Mono-dev] LLVM backend won't compile

2009-12-21 Thread Paul Melis
Hi, I'm configuring Mono 2.6.1 with --enable-llvm and can see that configure picks up the llvm-config script, but subsequently compiling gives errors due to missing LLVM include paths: 18:14|me...@juggle2:~/c/mono-2.6.1 ./configure --prefix=/home/melis/mono --enable-llvm [...] checking for

Re: [Mono-dev] LLVM backend won't compile

2009-12-21 Thread Zoltan Varga
Hi, Btw, I can't seem to find the switch to make to have it output the command it's executing (for checking -I flags)... Its make V=1, just like with the linux kernel. Zoltan Paul ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Mono-dev] LLVM backend won't compile

2009-12-21 Thread Paul Melis
Zoltan Varga wrote: Hi, Btw, I can't seem to find the switch to make to have it output the command it's executing (for checking -I flags)... Its make V=1, just like with the linux kernel. Ah, didn't know that :) Well, it seems the llvm include path is missing: [...] make[4]:

Re: [Mono-dev] LLVM backend won't compile

2009-12-21 Thread Zoltan Varga
Hi, This is now fixed in SVN HEAD/2.6 branches. Zoltan On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Paul Melis mono-de...@assumetheposition.nl wrote: Zoltan Varga wrote: Hi, Btw, I can't seem to find the switch to make to have it output the command it's executing

Re: [Mono-dev] LLVM backend won't compile

2009-12-21 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I noticed this problem on trunk, and I was fixing the Makefiles, but I forgot to commit the code before I left. The fix is simple, just add the LLVM_CFLAGS to the Makefile.am's definitions. On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Paul Melis wrote: Zoltan Varga wrote: Hi, Btw, I