Hi,
Carlos Alberto Cortez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey,
>
> I've been thinking about your ideas, but haven't understood yet the some
> of the reasons behind your suggestions. Maybe to have a cleaner code? or
> am I losing anything?
Definitely cleaner code, yes. Also, I was trying to remov
Hey,
I've been thinking about your ideas, but haven't understood yet the some
of the reasons behind your suggestions. Maybe to have a cleaner code? or
am I losing anything?
Some more comments below:
El vie, 23-09-2005 a las 18:34 +0530, Raja R Harinath escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Carlos Alberto Cortez
Hi,
Carlos Alberto Cortez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch implements extern assembly alias support for mcs.
> I've also added tests and errors for it, and all the tests are running
> fine. Could anybody of the mcs guys take a look at it?
I'm not particularly thrilled by the appr
Hey,
The attached patch implements extern assembly alias support for mcs.
I've also added tests and errors for it, and all the tests are running
fine. Could anybody of the mcs guys take a look at it?
Thanks,
Carlos.
PD - The next link gives some info about it:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/li
