Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-14 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I know but the old status pages did not check IL for NIEs; they used the presence of MonoTODO (and related) custom attribute to detect incomplete or missing implementations. I actually prefer this approach. I think I did a pass a few months ago where I moved NotImplementedException

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-12 Thread Gert Driesen
-Original Message- From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: zaterdag 11 april 2009 18:56 To: Gert Driesen Cc: 'Eyal Alaluf'; 'mono-devel-list' Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-11 Thread Gert Driesen
Of Gonzalo Paniagua Javier Sent: vrijdag 10 april 2009 21:31 To: Eyal Alaluf Cc: Miguel de Icaza; mono-devel-list Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages. On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 07:44 -0700, Eyal Alaluf wrote: Hi, Miguel. I like the visibility this page provides into how close Mono

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-11 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello Gert, I noticed a few important differences compared to the old status pages: The web UI is using the same engine now that gui-compare in mono-tools is using. The old status pages had not been maintained for months and stopped being updated for months before someone noticed. *

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-11 Thread Eyal Alaluf
Thanks, it does look a lot better. -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:gonzalo.m...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:31 PM To: Eyal Alaluf Cc: Miguel de Icaza; mono-devel-list Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages. On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 07:44

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-11 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 12:55 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: [...] * argument name mismatches are no longer reported (this will become more important as C# 4.0 now supports named parameters too) Yeah, in the future we will add a new option (just like we now have two modes of comparison)

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-10 Thread Eyal Alaluf
Message- From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:48 AM To: mono-devel-list Subject: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages. Hello folks, We have updated the Mono status pages

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-10 Thread Jonathan Pobst
...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:48 AM To: mono-devel-list Subject: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages. Hello folks, We have updated the Mono status pages to be both faster and provide

Re: [Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-10 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 07:44 -0700, Eyal Alaluf wrote: Hi, Miguel. I like the visibility this page provides into how close Mono is to the target .Net platform in the various configurations. I am missing two things - I'd like to know how many symbols are in the .Net assembly (to put things in

[Mono-dev] New Mono API status pages.

2009-04-09 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello folks, We have updated the Mono status pages to be both faster and provide now two levels of detail: http://www.go-mono.com/status The default view mode will remove many of the missing attributes that do not apply to Mono (for example, DebuggerVisibility attributes or bits