Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-04 Thread Marek Safar via Mono-devel-list
ailing List <mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core Hmm, the question is if the System.Reflection.Metadata.dll wasn't updated in Roslyn yet or there's some other issue. Marek might now more about it. On 2 Feb 2018, at 20:17, Neale Ferguson <ne.

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
sinenomine.net>> Sent: 02 February 2018 14:17 To: Alexander Köplinger; Jo Shields Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian” exception. If I remember correctly the issue was fixed in System.Reflection.Metadata.dll but

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Jo Shields via Mono-devel-list
18 14:17 To: Alexander Köplinger; Jo Shields Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian” exception. If I remember correctly the issue was fixed in System.Reflection.Metadata.dll but Roslyn still needed to pick up the fixed ve

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
Hmm, the question is if the System.Reflection.Metadata.dll wasn't updated in Roslyn yet or there's some other issue. Marek might now more about it. On 2 Feb 2018, at 20:17, Neale Ferguson > wrote: Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian”

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Neale Ferguson
Did. Still throwing the “Not little endian” exception. If I remember correctly the issue was fixed in System.Reflection.Metadata.dll but Roslyn still needed to pick up the fixed version. That might have happened in the meantime, best to just try :)

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
t: Friday, February 2, 2018 12:49:45 PM To: Jo Shields; Alexander Köplinger Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core I assume System.Reflection.Metadata.dll is still housed at Microsoft and the big-endian fix for it that enables Roslyn to run is still to sur

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Jo Shields via Mono-devel-list
: Jo Shields; Alexander Köplinger Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core I assume System.Reflection.Metadata.dll is still housed at Microsoft and the big-endian fix for it that enables Roslyn to run is still to surface? From: Jo Shields <joshi...@microsoft.c

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Neale Ferguson
plinger <alk...@microsoft.com<mailto:alk...@microsoft.com>>, Neale Ferguson <ne...@sinenomine.net<mailto:ne...@sinenomine.net>> Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List <mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net<mailto:mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net>> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Jo Shields via Mono-devel-list
018 12:06 To: Neale Ferguson Cc: Mono Devel Mailing List; Jo Shields Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core Hm, that's a packaging question for Jo (added on CC). On 2 Feb 2018, at 18:03, Neale Ferguson <ne...@sinenomine.net<mailto:ne...@sinenomine.net>> wrote: What’s the propos

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
to:mono-devel-list@lists.dot.net>> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core Ahh, sorry, you're talking about the mono-core.spec :D Yes, replacing .pdb there should work. I guess we can take that improvement as well? On 2 Feb 2018, at 17:41, Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list <m

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-02 Thread Neale Ferguson
Hey Neale, would you mind opening a pull request on GitHub with the BTLS changes for s390x? - Will do. I’ll checkout the latest copy and reapply Could you please list which pdb's it complains about? - All of them. No pdb files are created for the s390x build. What are they and how are the

Re: [Mono-dev] Building mono-core

2018-02-01 Thread Alexander Köplinger via Mono-devel-list
Hey Neale, would you mind opening a pull request on GitHub with the BTLS changes for s390x? Could you please list which pdb's it complains about? - Alex On 1 Feb 2018, at 21:44, Neale Ferguson > wrote: Hi, I found the 5.8 src rpm (thanks