Hi,
when we get an exception in InitOnce (in HttpApplication), we send this
exception to the browser, without changing StatusCode so we get a wonderful
http 200.
I've checked and it's the only place where we call FinalErrorWrite and we
didn't set StatusCode.
Hi,
Is TARGET_J2EE still in use (and TARGET_JVM), because it really complicate
some class?
Thanks in advance
Etienne
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
I removed TARGET_JVM with https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1200, do you
still see it somewhere?
TARGET_J2EE should be removed too I guess.
-- Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/elimination-of-TARGET-J2EE-TARGET-JVM-tp4664347p4664348.html
Sent from the
Hi
2014-10-24 12:37 GMT+02:00 akoeplinger alex.koeplin...@outlook.com:
I removed TARGET_JVM with https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1200, do you
still see it somewhere?
No (except in changelogs). Writing about TARGET_J2EE i remembered that
there was also a TARGET_JVM,
so I asked about it in my
Hi,
I'm nearly at the point where I can build mono win32 under Appeyor CI.
I'm trying to understand why there appears to be no mono.exe installed,
as a prelude to packaging up the build.
To do this I am trying to build the latest official release 3.2.3 but
this fails without monolite and I
I think I remember seeing a load of ifdefs for j2ee in Httpapplication.
On 24 Oct 2014 11:58, Etienne Champetier champetier.etie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
2014-10-24 12:37 GMT+02:00 akoeplinger alex.koeplin...@outlook.com:
I removed TARGET_JVM with https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1200, do you
2014-10-24 13:32 GMT+02:00 Martin Thwaites mar...@my2cents.co.uk:
I think I remember seeing a load of ifdefs for j2ee in Httpapplication.
That's exactly where i am
On 24 Oct 2014 11:58, Etienne Champetier champetier.etie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
2014-10-24 12:37 GMT+02:00 akoeplinger
2014-10-24 13:53 GMT+02:00 Etienne Champetier champetier.etie...@gmail.com
:
I know nothing about customerrors,
but we are in the init so we may have fail to parse the config,
so using customerror here is dangerous
Exception e = initialization_exception; HttpException exc =
Is this something that we can unit test to verify against .Net?
On 24 Oct 2014 13:26, Etienne Champetier champetier.etie...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-10-24 13:53 GMT+02:00 Etienne Champetier
champetier.etie...@gmail.com:
I know nothing about customerrors,
but we are in the init so we may have
Hi,
4 commits in this PR, 1 that should fix the race condition that lead to the
exception, 3 improvements.
https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1362
Etienne
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hello to all,
I noticed that mono_domain_unload is leaking memory. I wrote a small test
in my application
where I create a domain, load an assembly into it, execute the C# main
which does nothing and then call mono_domain_unload. The assembly and all
its references are loaded with
They are no longer in use but we're not in a rush to remove the from the
code base.
If it's making it hard for you to read a piece of code, remove them and
submit a pull request - we'd love to
kill more of those defines. :)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Etienne Champetier
Please file a bug report with your test case so we can fix any leaks.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Vardar Sahin sakirs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to all,
I noticed that mono_domain_unload is leaking memory. I wrote a small test
in my application
where I create a domain, load an
Hey,
There is no 3.5 profile. There are currently only 2.0, 4.0 (reference
assemblies), 4.5 and the mobile versions (mobile, android, ios).
What you think is 3.5 are assemblies introduced at 3.5, but we ship with
the above 4.0/4.5 ones.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:33 AM, xplicit s...@ngs.ru
Hi Miguel,
I think my preference would be to have the 3.x.x series continue (as
security fix only) with all the profiles, and essentially have it be a
legacy branch. Then have the 4.x.x series by a .NET 4.5+ only code base.
I think it should continue if people are willing to support it, but the
I'll try to reformulate my question. Do I understand correctly that in
new version of mono it will not be possible to compile assembly for
Mono/.NET 3.5 target and use the compiled assembly in Unity 3D (because
of referencing different corlib libraries in Unity (corlib 2.0) and
compiled assembly
Hello Martin,
There is no such thing as a 3.x.x series. It does not exist. It never
did.
You must be confused.
Miguel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Martin Thwaites monofo...@my2cents.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Miguel,
I think my preference would be to have the 3.x.x series continue (as
I can not answer that question, as I am not familiar with the situation,
and it seems like you are as confused as I am.
There wont be 2.0 reference assemblies anymore.
Miguel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Sergey Zhukov s...@ngs.ru wrote:
I'll try to reformulate my question. Do I understand
To make things clear, I had to make a small adjustment to
https://github.com/fanf2/unifdef so it didn't complain about C# multiline
strings. I had to remove this else if:
https://github.com/fanf2/unifdef/blob/90ca2eee76db715943ec4b7ca2892d155ca64075/unifdef.c#L1216-L1220,
then it ran fine on the
Hi Miguel,
I'm referring to 3.9, 3.10.1, etc. i.e. the current version being 3.10.1.
So I guess it should be considered the 3.x series.
I'm meaning that we shouldn't preclude there being a 3.11, or 3.12, if
there is a critical bug.
Also, do you have an answer to the distro question?
Thanks,
Ah, I see.
Yeah, perhaps we will move to the 4.0 branding, just need to check with
folks around here what they think.
For distros: nobody in the Linux world really ever cared about this.
We kept these profiles with the idea that this was something that actually
mattered, and it turns out, it
Is everything from 4.0 on the correct side currently there? I have seen
this cause confusion in the past for many thinking the version numbers
somehow match up :)
On Friday, October 24, 2014, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com wrote:
Ah, I see.
Yeah, perhaps we will move to the 4.0 branding,
This is a fun one. I'd love it if anyone could explain this to me.
using (var command = new SqliteCommand(@SELECT COUNT(*) FROM someTable WHERE
someColumn = @someValue , dbConn))
{
command.Parameters.Add(new SqliteParameter(someValue, foobar));
object scalar = command.ExecuteScalar();
Hello,
What happens is this. The value returned from ExecuteScalar is boxed.
This basically means that you have a wrapper that indicates the type of the
boxed object, as well as the contents of the boxed object.
The reality is that: (Int64) (scalar) and (Int32) (Int64) (scalar) perform
Eric Lippert has a good write up about this behavior:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/03/19/representation-and-identity.aspx
On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com wrote:
Hello,
What happens is this. The value returned from ExecuteScalar is
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:mig...@xamarin.com]
What happens is this. The value returned from ExecuteScalar is boxed. This
Got it, thanks. In fact, I simplified to this:
Object foo = (Int64)0;
Int64 foo64 = (Int64)foo;
Int32 foo6432 =
Hi All,
This is part of the ongoing work for the aspnetwebstack. The only thing
it's missing is tests around the PasswordStrength regex, however, I'm no
good with regex so maybe someone can give me some to add to the test and
valid/invalid strings to test against?
I'm also hoping that the
27 matches
Mail list logo
