Hi,
Mono 1.9 was published on March 13th of 2008:
http://www.go-mono.com/mono-downloads/download.html
This is our best Mono release yet. More than 400 bugs were fixed
between 1.2.6 and 1.9.
We branched on January 28th of 2008 and did 6 preview releases. More
than 100 of those 400 bugs were fi
Hi,
We've released 1.9.1 as a minor bugfix update to 1.9.
The release notes are here:
http://go-mono.com/archive/1.9.1/
and downloads are available here:
http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads
Thanks to all those who contributed to this release.
Enjoy!
Wade
signature.asc
Description: This
Hi,
The livecd and vmware images for 1.9.1 have been posted and are available from
our download page:
http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads
Thanks to Thomas and Marek who got mouse and video integration working, as well
as drag and drop.
Enjoy!
Wade
_
Wow, libmono.a is 64MB, 15 MB compressed... :( Um, maybe we could have
a win32 embedded Wiki page that describes this rather than ship 2 files
of that size in the installer?
Ideas or recommendations?
Wade
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 18:23 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Just to be sure, this was us
Hi,
I'm planning on making a package split for boo.
This came about from banshee depending on boo, which has an assembly
that depends on nant, thus pulling in lots of -devel packages.
So I'll take Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll and put it in boo-devel.
Debian does a split of .dlls and .exes. Should the .e
Currently, the only way to get mono-debugger working correctly is
compiling it from source. We're still working on some prebuilt
packages, and we will announce when they are ready.
Wade
P.S. The debugger was accidentally included in the 1.1.8.1 linux
installer, but it does not work.
On Thu, 20
RPMs for mono-debugger have been posted to www.go-mono.com and are
available in the OpenCarpet and yum channels.
Wade
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:02 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Currently, the only way to get mono-debugger working correctly is
> compiling it from source. We're still
The Mono Linux Installer (1.1.8.2_1) has been updated to include the
mono-debugger.
Wade
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 12:11 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> RPMs for mono-debugger have been posted to www.go-mono.com and are
> available in the OpenCarpet and yum channels.
>
> Wade
>
>
Hi Mike,
It almost sounds like the default mono that came with suse 9.3 is being
used to run mdb without setting up the environment vars to find the libs
included with the installer.
The installer puts some settings in $HOME/.bashrc that need to be
loaded. You can do this by starting a new shell
The solution for SuSE 9.3 ended up being to install the compat-readline4
package. I may end up adding the readline binaries to the installer so
that it doesn't matter if you have the readline4 binaries installed or
not.
Wade
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:35 +0100, Mike Horsley wrote:
> Gary
>
> no
Hi Kornél,
I'm working on the windows installer and it should be finished shortly.
I'm shooting for today but it may be tomorrow.
The good news is that after I'm done automating it the installers will
be released in parallel with the mono releases.
Your suggestions are very much appreciated.
I
are good news.:)
>
> May I have a look at the setup script before you build the installer?
>
> Kornél
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wade Berrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [M
Get 'em while it's hot:
http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.1.9.1_1/windows/mono-1.1.9.1-gtksharp-1.0.10-2.3.91-win32-0.exe
Thanks for the suggestions and input. There are improvements to be
made, but this should do for now. Let me know of any installer issues.
Thanks Paco, you rock :)
Wade
__
there any reason why you decided not to include gdiplus.dll?
>
I'm still waiting for Miguel to approve it. He wasn't sure if we should
or not.
Wade
> Kornél
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wade Berrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
re shell scripts as well I think they should be used in cygwin.
>
> Kornél
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Zoltan Varga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Kornél Pál" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Francisco Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECT
--- Begin Message ---
> - also, as Kornel said, the runtime should not be statically linked,
> but instead it should be
> dynamically linked against a mono-1.dll file. This should be the
> default in our build process, so I don't know why this isn't
> happening. What configure arguments are you
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 07:03 -0500, Francisco Martinez wrote:
>
> Wade it shows all the hard work you have put into this. Good job!
> Since some of the exe(s) are now in a different location, I will have to
> adjust the tools like MonoLaunch and the Visual Studio .NET add-in
> (vsprj2make).
ectories relative to it's own location or does it have
> > any hardcoded paths?
> >
> > Kornél
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Zoltan Varga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Wade Berrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Hey,
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 02:23 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote:
> This works fine on my system using latest cygwin. My libint is in
> /lib/libintl.a. Perhaps you don't have that package installed, or
> libintl-1.dll is in a directory
> in your PATH so libtool finds it first ?
This same error happens
imum:
autoconf
automake
bison
cpio
gcc-mingw-core
gcc-mingw-g++
make
openssh
unzip
zip
wget
cvs
cygrunsrv
patch
subversion
vim
wget
And of course other packages get selected by dependency.
Am I missing something obvious?
Wade
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:19 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hey,
>
using the latest cygwin libs for me. Altought, it
> is still statically linked
> even if I tell disable it, so its not all good. What version of
> automake and libtool are you using, ie what does automake --version
> and libtool --version return ?
>
> Zoltan
One more note, looks like monodis.exe, mono.exe, and monograph.exe were
not statically linked.
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 18:05 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hey,
>
> A little while ago I discovered a dumb mistake on my part: I didn't
> have libtool installed.
>
> It's
System.Xml.XPath/Parser.cs
Mono.Xml.Xsl/PatternParser.cs Mono.Xml.Xsl/PatternTokenizer.cs | tr '/'
''` @../../build/deps/basic_System.Xml.dll.response
That's about all I've been able to figure out.
Wade
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 18:07 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> One
do anything except
return an error code of 255.
So it probably turns out that System.XML is the first dll that gets
compiled from the mini wrapper?
I wonder what could be causing this?
Wade
> On 10/4/05, Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wad
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 18:36 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
> > From: Wade Berrier
> > So it probably turns out that System.XML is the first dll that gets
> > compiled from the mini wrapper?
>
> Yes, it is, but this was mentioned by Zoltán in the message you replyed to:
&g
ool1.5
> openssl097
> openssl
> links
> login
> lynx
> make
> mc
> minires
> openssh
> patch
> patchutils
> pkgconfig
> tar
> wget
> which
>
> Note that this list includes some of my needs not required by Mono like mc,
> wget, openssh, patch
Could also cross compile from linux :)
Right now ./configure treats mingw and cygwin the same. You'd have to
make some adjustments for the mingw target, but the compile times would
definitely be faster.
Wade
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 06:52 -0400, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:32
l Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hopefully, you can continue allowing the Mono Win32
> > installers to allow
> > parallel installs.
> >
> > I need the ability to have multiple versions of mono
> > installed. Some
> > application work
The latest Windows installer doesn't set any environment variables in
the wrapper scripts and batch files (MONO_PATH, etc...). This works
fine in finding the gac binaries.
I've looked into doing this for the linux installer as well, and some
programs didn't work. gmcs worked, but mcs didn't (cou
Hey,
I noticed this in SuSE autobuild... looks like gcc4 was updated in
SuSE's build system and now this patch is required to build libgdiplus.
Wade
--- cairo/pixman/src/pixman-remap.h 2005-08-29 20:11:27.0 +0200
+++ cairo/pixman/src/pixman-remap.h 2005-11-21 18:36:11.200147358 +0100
@@ -
The daily downloads are now updated and will happen at 1 am EST.
Also, the bug where mono-latest.tar.gz pointing to the wrong file has
been fixed. (It previously pointed to 1.1.9 downloads instead of
1.1.10).
Wade
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 10:44 -0500, Miguel Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > there hav
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the great feedback and solution. The debugger needs some
slight changes in order to work in a relocated environment.
I went ahead and filed a bug:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77062
Wade
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 18:42 +0100, Hans Kratz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I trie
Hey all,
We're getting ready for the 1.1.13 release. Tarballs will be created
Thursday evening MST. This will probably be our last drop into the
upcoming SuSE products.
Wade
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Mono
Currently the monodoc browser is available on many older distros as well
as win32. But with this change it won't work on older distros nor
win32. Also, distros that use the linux installer without being able to
run gtk#2 also won't be able to use the browser. I thought that
mono-tools was using
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 09:18 -0600, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 21:49 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> > Currently the monodoc browser is available on many older distros as well
> > as win32. But with this change it won't work on older distros nor
> > win32.
This is the first release we're shipping IPCE instead of IronPython.
Also, it might be worthwhile to mention the sparc speedups.
Wade
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:02 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> As usual, the preview for the Mono 1.2.3 release is here:
>
> http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.
Hi,
If RSS.NET.dll (DateTime.Parse()) can't parse a date it uses
DateTime.MinValue in it's place.
This was happening for lupus' feed, making his old posts always show up
on monologue.
The maintainer of advogato fixed the date format in his rss feeds so
this shouldn't happen anymore.
I'm thinkin
Good idea. Patch attached. If no one objects, I'll commit.
Wade
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 09:02 -0200, Rafael Teixeira wrote:
> I vote yes, but it would be nice to tag the error in the author's list
> to the right, as when the feed can't be read.
>
> :)
>
>
Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:35 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 20:31 -0400, Joshua Tauberer wrote:
> > Wade Berrier wrote:
> > > There is a simple way to migrate existing svn repositories to use the
> > > new hostname.
> >
> > Slightly simple
r 11, 2007 at 01:31:41PM -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> > Notice to all using the anonymous subversion repository:
> >
> > svn.myrealbox.com has been renamed to anonsvn.mono-project.com
> >
> > Wade
>
> Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: [Mono-list] New
Hi,
Mono 1.2.4 preview sources, packages, and installers are available at:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
The beginnings of the release notes for 1.2.4 are available at:
http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.4/
If no critical bugs are found after the preview period, these
Hi,
"Preview 2" has been uploaded to this same location. mono/mcs was
retagged as mono-1-2-4 from the mono-1-2-4 branch.
Thanks to all who have taken a look at the preview releases.
Wade
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 22:26 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mono 1.2.4 previe
Hi,
The preview release has been updated (Preview 3) This includes some
fixes, amongst others, to get vb.net working on asp.net.
Again, thanks to all who've been trying the previews out.
Wade
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 19:57 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Preview 2&qu
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:34 -0700, Matt Jones wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm working on improving .net support under wine this summer as an
> intern at Google, and I stumbled upon the test suite webpage[1] on the
> website. I've tried downloading the scripts used to compile all the
> data, but the pub
At the suggestion of Paolo, I ran:
"strings /usr/lib/libMonoPosixHelper.so |grep overflow"
against the file that shipped in the 1.2.3.1 rpm, with no results.
Jonathan, could you try running this?
Also, could there possibly be another libMonoPosixHelper.so that is
getting called?
Wade
On Wed,
I looked at the build logs, and DEBUG is not defined anywhere. (I also checked
config.h)
Here's the exact make output for trees.c:
if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I.. -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I..
-DGC_
file, it gave me the following
> message :
>
> Binary file /path/libMonoPosixHelper.so matches
>
> So it seems that this is the file that is being used. Is there a way to
> know for sure which .so file is actually used when running mono?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
Hi,
Mono 1.2.5 preview sources, packages, and installers are available at:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
At some point, the release notes for 1.2.5 will be available at:
http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/
If no critical bugs are found after the preview period, these
The windows installer includes gtk# 2.10.
>
> I've been waiting for this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- Wade Berrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Mono 1.
Definitely.
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 16:56 +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
> 2007/7/28, Wade Berrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Mono 1.2.5 preview sources, packages, and installers are available at:
>
> This seems to cause IronPython 1.1 to segfault, which is a regression.
> Fil
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:33 +0300, Szentpali Janos wrote:
> Lluis Sanchez wrote:
> > El dc 01 de 08 del 2007 a les 13:49 +0300, en/na Szentpali Janos va
> > escriure:
> >
> >> Is there a point in complaining (reporting) that monodevelop (included
> >> in Mono 1.2.5 preview) doesn't work on othe
Hi,
Mono 1.2.5 preview 2 sources, packages, and installers are available at:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
At some point, the release notes for 1.2.5 will be available at:
http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/
If no critical bugs are found after the preview period, the
y difference between those installation methods
> (source and binary installer) in terms of the assembly versions in
> gac ?
>
> On 8/2/07, Wade Berrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mono 1.2.5 preview 2 sources, pack
Hi,
Mono 1.2.5 has been released. Release notes are here:
http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/
Downloads are available from:
http://mono-project.com/Downloads
There are also rpms in the openSUSE Build Service (which has RPMS for
newer Fedora distros and suse factory):
http://download.opensuse.o
This was set back up... should have dailies tomorrow.
Wade
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 19:42 +0200, Joachim Ante wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems the daily test tarballs are not being generated anymore.
> The last test tar ball was 21-08, last month.
> http://mono.ximian.com/daily/
>
> I'd really appreciat
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 16:56 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different
> > interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the
> > Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows.
>
> Are the
Hi,
Status pages are generated for olive on monobuild. Here's the link
(which is temporary for now because old builds get removed from
mono.ximian.com):
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/builds/HEAD/suse-100-i586/olive/86908/files/steps/api-diff/
Miguel mentioned that there are some missing asse
Hi,
I've updated some monobuild documentation on the wiki:
http://www.mono-project.com/BuildSystem/MonoBuild
Wade
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
htt
I restarted it today...
Thanks!
Wade
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 09:13 +0100, Andy Hume wrote:
> It's still hung!
>
>install-deps inprogress [ Running for 1682 min(s) ]
>
> Can it be killed?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I generate class status pages in monobuild now instead of during the
nightly daily build.
Check out:
http://www.mono-project.com/Template:StatusPages
I'm pretty sure the description for olive needs to be updated...
A cron job will run once a day and collect the latest status pages from
mon
I think the issue is that the masterinfos that I use on the olive module
only has the 3.0 stuff. I think after they are updated, or after we
have 2.1 masterinfos, they will have the silverlight assemblies.
I'll look into it.
Wade
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:57 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello
status?platf
> orm=win-4-i386&package=mono&HEAD_or_RELEASE=HEAD
>
> BTW is the start time reported in UTC or +4?
>
> Andy
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wade Berrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 16 October 2007 22:58
>
Hi,
Mono 1.2.6 has been released!
Downloads are available: http://mono-project.com/Downloads
Rpms in the suse build service will soon be updated.
( http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Mono/ )
Major highlights:
* Mono 1.2.6 can now be used as an SDK for creating Silverlight
We decided to leave Mono out of the path and instead have a command
prompt that sets up the environment. Maybe it's a personal preference,
but it also lets you have multiple versions of Mono installed.
Maybe we should reconsider?
Wade
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 14:52 +1100, Alistair Leslie-Hughes w
Hi,
The 1.9 preview 3 win32 installer will be built with innosetup 5.2.2.
Thanks,
Wade
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 10:41 +0100, Kornél Pál wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are building the Windows installer using Inno Setup 5.1.5 that was
> released almost three years ago. Currently the latest release is 5.2.2
Hi,
As was posted in the news items, I am publishing hourly snapshot sources and
rpms for some later suse distros.
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/snapshot/download-trunk/
The wiki has also been updated with this link:
http://mono-project.com/Other_Downloads#Snapshots
This may be convenient
Hi,
As was posted in the news items, I am publishing hourly snapshot sources and
rpms for some later suse distros.
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/snapshot/download-trunk/
The wiki has also been updated with this link:
http://mono-project.com/Other_Downloads#Snapshots
This may be convenient
Hi,
I've had some requests to ship a .lib file in the windows installer in
order to embed the mono runtime on windows.
I found this information:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg00667.html
We're already shipping libmono.dll.a . (I do run strip --strip-unneeded
on it, although I'm not sur
Yeah, sorry about that. I think they had the wrong preview number on
that page for a day or so before I fixed it.
Wade
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 21:01 -0600, Thomas Wiest wrote:
> D Bera wrote:
> >> We've just released Mono 1.9.0 Preview 4 today! Please help us out by
> >> giving it a try with
Could you run monodevelop with increased logging? Do this with the
following from a terminal window:
export MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug
monodevelop
That could help shed some light on this. If you have gtk+2.4 installed
(which it appears you do), I'm not sure what the problem could be, other
than some
set that
> I would be better off installing if Gnome isn't my primary environment?
>
> j- k-
>
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 14:00, Wade Berrier wrote:
> > Could you run monodevelop with increased logging? Do this with the
> > following from a terminal window:
&
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 00:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It was good to know that it was a bug, as a first thing, because i actually
> ended up suspecting that it might have not been a bug.
> And it is good to know that you are still paying attention to it.
> And even better to know that you m
I've updated the Windows installer (1.1.14) to contain a new gtk# that
includes the gtk# policy.config files.
Find it here:
http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads
Wade
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:04 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 00:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
&g
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> >Attached goes the file "erro.txt" with the output. But, yes, my program uses
> >Gtk# 2.8.
> >
> >And,
> >"The Linux installer comes with gtk# 2.4, while the windows installer
This is also happening on macos.
Wade
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:30 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The error I get:
>
> /.libs/libmonoruntime.a(threads.o): In function
> `mono_debugger_init_threads':
> /mono/mono/mono/metadata/threads.c:2902: undefined reference to
> `_gc_thread_vtable'
>
1.1.14_1 does come with MD 0.10. 1.1.14_0 does not.
The _release revision is only for linux installer updates.
Wade
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 18:54 -0400, Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Does MonoDevelop 0.10 come in the latest Mono 1.1.14 Linux Installer?
>
> If not, can it be updated to include it?
>
>
The plan is to have one out the next couple of weeks.
Wade
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:40 -0500, Colt D. Majkrzak wrote:
> Is there any projected time line on when an Intel Mono installer will
> be available for the Intel Mac’s? If not, are there any notes some
> where on how to properly build mono
Hi,
I've created the 10.1 jail for i586 yesterday, and will do x86_64 today.
After I get buildbuddy installed and configured I can build some rpms.
Wade
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:05 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > A question: will this release be available in RPMs for SUSE 10.1? Th
Hi,
In trying to build and package nant, I've found that nant has some
internal libraries that reference the 1.0 profile of .NET:
berrier:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm
-i ../RPMS/noarch/nant-0.85_rc4-1.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
mono(System) = 1.0.3300.0 is needed by nant-0.85_rc4-1
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 11:39 -0300, Rafael Teixeira wrote:
> Mono nowadays packs the .NET 1.1 libraries (Version=1.0.5000.0) that
> are compatible with the .NET 1.0 libraries (Version=1.0.3300.0). So
> adapt your script to add a rpm provides for each 1.1 library you pack.
> A better, but more
Hi Gert,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 18:33 +0200, Gert Driesen wrote:
> I really appreciate the work you're doing, but wouldn't it be best if we
> (the NAnt team) would release the RPM's ?
>
> (same goes for NUnit, ...)
I think that would be fine. I have an interest in posting and building
rpms anyw
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 14:32 +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> To me this sounds like you try to package binaries, which is bad for
> different reasons. One reason you just found, you can't predict the
> references that will be used.
> If you compile nant correctly from source, you will have the exp
Hi,
I've recently finished adding the class status webpage generation to the
same cron job that produces the dailies (monolite, monocharger, etc).
I copied scripts and files from trunk/release/buildbot/scripts to
trunk/release/scripts/class_status. mono-snapshot.sh, which produces
the dailies, n
Hi,
The source tree has been tagged for 1.2. The release candidate tarballs
are available here:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/rc/sources-rc/
I'll post some packages and repos later, as well as installers.
Please try your apps, especially winform apps, and keep the bug reports
rolling!
Than
I've posted packages and installers. Enjoy!
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/rc/download-rc/
Wade
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 19:44 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The source tree has been tagged for 1.2. The release candidate tarballs
> are available here:
>
>
Hi,
Several have reported that the tarballs available from
mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable.
This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using. We
must use this limited format to support some older distros.
To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the so
Hi,
Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :(
Wade
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 06:24 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at
> compression. How was the difference?
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> Wade Berrier wrote:
>
Raja has fixed the files that were causing the issues with 'make dist',
so I've reverted back to using 'make dist' instead of 'make dist-zip'.
Wade
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:06 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Several have reported that the tarball
Hi,
1.2.1 has been tagged and preview sources/packages/installers are posted
here:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
If no major issues are found, this release will be posted to
mono-project.com next week.
Mono doesn't currently build on solaris, thence the missing pack
Hi,
Preview sources, packages, and installers for 1.2.2 are located here:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
Enjoy!
Wade
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 10:39 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello Jonathan, Wade,
>
> > Also, if Wade has a Windows preview package, I can run some
Hi,
There's a brand new image based on openSUSE 10.2 on the download page
with the latest Mono: 1.2.2.1.
The image is mostly similar to the previous image but has the following
changes:
-All packages from a default suse install are included. This results in
a bigger image download but should be
Yes, although like Miguel says, sounds like they don't work, even though
they are included.
Wade
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 09:58 -0800, Daniel Morgan wrote:
> When you say default suse install, would this include
> open office.org 2.x with mono bindings?
>
> --- Wade Berrier
Hi,
I've 'unstuck' the arm build, although it is failing...
Thanks,
Wade
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:27 +0100, Thomas Strecker wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure who to contact, so I'll try this way.
> The debian-31-arm build
> (http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/python/monobuild.py) is stuck for a
> lo
Hi,
There are currently several build failures. Neale is looking into the
s390x failure. Macos is failing for both platforms; looks like shell
related build failures which I'll look into.
Solaris8 on sparc has been failing for some time, as well as debian on
arm and sparc. Out of these, I usua
94 matches
Mail list logo
