I've also started FileSelection, but am yielding on Gtk.Label, as I
think someone else posted with an intent to doc that.
That was me, and I'm about 50% through it. It's a little more complex.
- Raphael
--
Raphael Schmid
Martin-Luther-Strasse 26
72224 Ebhausen
GERMANY
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
I just uploaded some updates to ArrowType.xml to
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=3462. On top of
that, there is also a
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=3456 for
Arrow.xml. If no one has comments these, I'll commit them tonight.
--
This is exactly the same problem I am having as well. Running Slackware 8.1
or RedHat 8.0, I get the same thing. Any help from anyone on this would be
wonderful :)
-Dave Rivera
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of echo dev
Sent: Sunday,
Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Source code for Mono, MCS, the Mono Debugger, XSP is available as
well from that web page. The sources are:
Hi guys,
I should clearly point out that the latest release of the Mono Debugger does not work
with
this Mono release. If you want to use
Stefan Matthias Aust wrote:
Another problem might be that configure cannot find the GC lib
Okay, I cannot make mono pickup the libgc. I compiled gc6.1 after a
configure --prefix=/usr and make and installation seemed have to
worked. Still, mono's configure is complaining.
From the config.log
And even if I try to continue without gc support, things get worse. For
some reason the configure script got the idea that C:/cygwin would be
a good prefix for the includes. The correct prefix would have been
/usr. What's happening here? Is it my fault because of mixing
cygwin-gcc and
Hi all,
I'm having problems building mono-debugger-0.2.0.
I have sucessfully built the latest snapshot of the mono and mcs sources (
the 23 Feb snapshot ) without any obvious errors.
After untarring the source for the mono-debugger I've run configure, then
'make'.
I get the following error
The memory stream makes a copy of the byte array it
works on. I already submitted a bug for this and
suggested a fix.
It seems to me that your little test program fails for
the same reason as my test failed.
The bug number is: 38481
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=38481
-- Carsten
Congratulations!!
-(I know its lame to post only with that but ..anyway.. )-
- - Original Message -
From: Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mono Announce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:03 PM
Subject: [Mono-list] Mono 0.20 has been released
Title: mono release distribution
Would it be possible to use the commonly used distribution channels like the 'cygwin' setup installer, and the 'fink' tool to release source/binaries of the mono project? This would probably help a lot of frustrated users that try to get a version to build. I
El lun, 24 de 02 de 2003 a las 12:31, Stefan Matthias Aust escribió:
Hi!
I tried to compile mono-0.20 on windows/cygin. I think i followed the
instructions. I've .NET 1.0.3705 installed. I upgraded cygwin to the
most current version, added the provided prebuild zips relative to /usr
I would not want mono installed via cygwin.
A Windows Installer for Mono 0.20 can be found at
http://primates.ximian.com/~duncan/Mono/mono-0.20-stable.exe
This is thanks to Lupus and Johannes for packaging it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
El lun, 24 de 02 de 2003 a las 19:01, Daniel Lopez escribió:
So what is the correct way of invoking the method so it will be executed in
the other domain? I tried every method I could think of with no luck.
Hi Daniel!
Dunno if there's another way of doing what you want, but you can try
using
Hi,
How can I uninstall GTK#? I tried using the command [make uninstall] but it
didn't work. I am going to replace the gtk-0.7 with gtk-0.8. Do I just
delete the gtk-0.7 and reinstall the gtk-0.8? Thanks in advance for any
comments:).
-G
Hi,
I am looking for the correct way to call a method in a transparent proxy
from the C side of mono. When I create an object in a different AppDomain
and call it from C# everything is fine, but when I do it from C, it gets
executed in the same domain.
I attach some sample code to demonstrate
Could this help?
http://mono.jroith.de/monkeyguide/embeddc.html
/Richard
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 19:01, Daniel Lopez wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for the correct way to call a method in a transparent proxy
from the C side of mono. When I create an object in a different AppDomain
and call it from
Hello!
I should clearly point out that the latest release of the Mono Debugger does not
work with
this Mono release. If you want to use the Mono Debugger, you need to use the latest
CVS
version or wait until the next release - which I'll do tomorrow or on wednesday.
Oops. I should have
This should work:
mono_runtime_invoke (mono_object_get_virtual_method(sampleApplicationHost,
klass-vtable[i]), sampleApplicationHost, NULL, NULL);
Lluis
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject:
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 19:01, Daniel Lopez wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for the correct way to call a method in a transparent proxy
from the C side of mono. When I create an object in a different AppDomain
and call it from C# everything is fine, but when I do it from C, it gets
executed in the
I get the same result :(
I looked at mono_object_get_virtual_method before, and if i understand
correctly, that gives me the real method of the object that will be called
by the proxy, but it still gets executed in the same domain?
This should work:
mono_runtime_invoke
Hello,
If you downloaded the Windows binaries for Mono 0.20 today (they were
available for about 10 minutes, but we got 30 downloads), please read:
http://www.go-mono.com/virus.html
The binaries shipped with a virus.
We apologize for the inconvenience,
Miguel.
On 02/24/03 Daniel Lopez wrote:
I am quite unsure if we will support such things. Cant you put that code
into a managed method?
thanks! that made the trick, I added:
public void ProcessRequest2 ()
{
Console.WriteLine(Process2 request AppDomain: +
Hi,
Really, i need to know how to build and test your implementation of
Windows.Form inside a Windows OS environemnt ??
Any help,
Thanx in advance,
Yours,
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
Hi,
There is a Nant .build file in the mcs\class\System.Windows.Forms
folder. You have to run Nant there.
After successful build you will have System.Windows.Forms.dll
in the Test sub-folder and ..\lib folder.
Now you can copy the dll and compile your sources like:
csc source.cs
Hello Elan,
I've been working for the last couple days on getting a .NET application
to work under Mono. I'm happy to report success, which is cool because
the application does encrypted network transfer of XML-serialized
objects. In order to get it to work, I had to make a number of fixes
Hi Danel,
I'm a bit late into the thread but I will try to give you some hints of
how to fix this;
klass = ((MonoTransparentProxy *)sampleApplicationHost)-klass;
The TP-klass points to the real class object and we don't change that
vtable when creating a proxy (the proxies is local to a
I assume it is because MemoryStream.Close() resets its internal buffer
and CryptoStream.FlushFinalBlock() closes the stream.
I don't know that Close() disposes internal buffer by ECMA spec.
MS stream apparently holds.
This appears correct. When I comment out the stream close everything
Gentlemen,
I was thinking about beginning work on the System.EnterpriseServices
chunk of Mono (most notably, the ServicedComponent piece). I was
wonderinf if you guys were planning on beginning to get a real ES system
up, or if you want help? If neither of you have plans, I was going to
Hi Brian,
Could you please file this as an MCS bug ? That way it won't get lost
in the list's (rather heavy) traffic and also ensure that we get down to
fixing it.
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 20:31, Brian Ritchie wrote:
The following snippet is causing an error when compiling with mcs (on
The bottom half of the patch has been applied. Thank you.
For the upper half, we may need more discussion. As far as I've observed, the
patch changes the code to simulate Microsoft behavior, which seems to be a
wrong behavior. I wonder if we should follow suit.
Regards,
Alan
- Original
30 matches
Mail list logo
