On 06/03/03 Chris Ferrell wrote:
I'm having a problem compiling mini. Everytime I do I get
In file included from mini-x86.c:20:
cpu-pentium.h:3: parse error before `1'
mini-x86.c:1116: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
The cpu-pentium.h array is generated
Im using Redhat 8.0
Apache 2.0.40
mono-0.24-2
mod_mono from CVS
Copied mod_mono.so and ModMono.dll to the appropriate dirs.
I added in my httpd.conf file the following:
LoadModule mono_module modules/mod_mono.so
MonoApplication /mono /home/hngo/xsp/server/test
When I try to go to
Hi Ngo,
I will look into this
http://127.0.0.1/mono/index.aspx should work in the mean time
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:17:45AM -0700, Ngo HH (Hao) at Aera wrote:
Im using Redhat 8.0
Apache 2.0.40
mono-0.24-2
mod_mono from CVS
Copied mod_mono.so and ModMono.dll to the appropriate dirs.
When I specifiy http://127.0.0.1/mono/index.aspx I get a different error:
Error in '/mono' Application
Error
Description: Error processing request.
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Ngo HH (Hao) at Aera wrote:
When I specifiy http://127.0.0.1/mono/index.aspx I get a different error:
Error in '/mono' Application
Error
Description: Error processing request.
Error
Yes - it and its parent is owned by apache.apache
and I chmod 755
so from /home/hngo
I chown -R apache.apache xsp
I chmod -R 755 xsp
thanks for your help!
Hao.
-Original Message-
From: 'Daniel Lopez' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Ngo HH (Hao) at
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Ngo HH (Hao) at Aera wrote:
Yes - it and its parent is owned by apache.apache
and I chmod 755
so from /home/hngo
I chown -R apache.apache xsp
I chmod -R 755 xsp
On a Red Hat machine it is unlikely that the http process will have access
to /home/hngo unless you have
Can you email me privately the full httpd.conf file
and the list.txt text file result of running
ls -lRa /home/hngo/xsp/ list.txt
Yes - it and its parent is owned by apache.apache
and I chmod 755
so from /home/hngo
I chown -R apache.apache xsp
I chmod -R 755 xsp
thanks for your
Woohooo!
Yes - You guessed it! It works!
You guys are so quick and great!
Since you guys are so great, one more question please?
I know, Im greedy.
Can I using Apache's virtual hosting to host multiple domains and have each domain
serve up its own separate /mono pages?
I only have
Hi Ngo,
Support for that is planned, but not yet implemented. It is straightforward
to do, if anyone wants to take a stab at it I can help them.
For now your best bet may be to set up different apache instances and do
reverse proxy to them
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:03:04AM -0700, Ngo HH (Hao)
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Ngo HH (Hao) at Aera wrote:
Can I using Apache's virtual hosting to host multiple domains and have
each domain serve up its own separate /mono pages?
As I understand it, as it currently stands you can only have a single
Location handled by mod_mono - I am sure this will
Hello,
I'm putting together a proof-of-concept application that calls from a
C++ command application into a C# class using mono_runtime_invoke. I
need to be able to return values from the C# calls to my C++ code.
According to the instructions at:
http://www.go-mono.com/embedded-api.html
I need
I'm working on a proof of concept application that will need to call
from a C++ command line application into a C# object running under mono.
For performance testing I'll need to run the same app the same way on
both Linux and Windows. I've been looking at the embed sample
application under
Gonzalo,
I negotiated upto 1 Gig of traffic a month for monochargeswill this be
enough? If not what about using mono-charge-mini (which I would prefer anyways).
Jackson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gonzalo Paniagua
Javier
Normally if you do:
mcs: make
mono: make make install
mcs: make install
it works pretty good, even if the runtime is changing.
- URS C. MUFF
SOFTWARE ARCHITECT - RESEARCH LAB
QUARK INC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - X6360
+1 (303) 894 3360
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail transmission and
El mi? 11-06-2003 a las 01:38, Jackson Harper escribió:
Gonzalo,
I negotiated upto 1 Gig of traffic a month for monochargeswill this be
enough? If not what about using mono-charge-mini (which I would prefer anyways).
Yeah, using that one is an option to consider. As long as you
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 19:38, Jackson Harper wrote:
I negotiated upto 1 Gig of traffic a month for monochargeswill
this be enough? If not what about using mono-charge-mini (which I
would prefer anyways).
Jackson,
I really think Ximian should be picking up the tab for this ;-). There
is no
17 matches
Mail list logo
